Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal

ISSN: 2708-2261

www.bcsrj.com

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47264/bcsrj0201011

Biol. Clin. Sci. Res. J., Volume, 2021: e011 

Review Article

APPLICATIONS OF EPIGENETICS IN FORENSIC INVESTIGATIONS: A BRIEF REVIEW

ULLAH RA1*, ALI A1, HUSSAIN N2, MALIK A1

Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, The University of Lahore, Lahore Pakistan

Centre for Applied Molecular Biology, University the Punjab Lahore, Lahore Pakistan

Corresponding author email: ranajaved190@gmail.com

Abstract

Forensic science is a discipline that has the capacity to be merged with every promise to offer a solution to a criminal investigation to help the legal system. Epigenetics is a branch of genetics that deals with the study of environmental interaction with the genome. The emerging field of forensic epigenetics has a variety of applications in criminal investigations. It provides an addictive tool to solve criminal activity-related issues. In this review, we have showcased the brief use of epigenetics to sort out forensic-related issues and help the legal system. We have briefly taken a snapshot of genetics, epigenetics, and application of epigenetics in forensic science that how it could offer solutions to queries of forensic nature. Also, potential future developments in the field and their probable impact have been anticipated. It has many potential applications which are still to be explored. It complements forensic science at many potential levels.

Keywords: epigenetics, forensic, methylation, chromatin, acetylation

Introduction

Geneticists revise the protein encoding sequence; though, for epigenetic experts, there is no clear 'epigenetic'. Yet, during the previous year, beyond the published 2,500 research articles, plentiful science based conferences and quite new scientific publishing books have also been dedicated to theme relevant to epigenetics. There has been continuity as far as a possibility in the field of biology aimed at confrontations which has dissimilar senses for variety of people. Epigenetics presents a thrilling instance, just because it presents numerous connotations through autonomous heritages. As far as Conrad Waddington is concerned, it had been learning the basic epigenesis: which entails that by which methods genotypes pave pay for emergence of phenotypes throughout growth (Bird, 2007). Through disparity, Riggs and coworkers demarcated epigenetics by way of “the study of mitotically and/or meiotically transmissible variations in gene purpose that cannot be elucidated by fluctuations in DNA sequence” (Riggs et al., 1970). In additional arguments, heritage, nonetheless in a way as scientists of today figure it out. The presented descriptions vary evidently, though these are frequently conflated the way as still these are mentioned in a single spectacle. The term coined by Waddington  includes the bustle of altogether progressive biology experts who learn in what way gene action through growth reasons phenotype to arise, nonetheless it gets hurts by the drawback that progressive biology experts seldom, uncertainty always, custom this kind of code to define their arena (Waddington, 1957).

The description made by Riggs plus his associates expresses whatever epigenetic discipline does not; parting exposed whatever brands of machinery are functional. In that scientific writing, author given instances in way which describes that in what way epigenetic marvels remain calculated besides understood, also he suggested a reviewed explanation which exemplifies modern custom of the term (Russo et al., 1996). The kind of molecular foundation of genetic and epigenetics had remained considered in diversity among all of organisms. The methylation of DNA and the Polycomb structures originate contiguous to perfect, since adjustments in the given genome present frequently inborn via succeeding peers from cells also occasionally living organisms (Jeggo & Holiday, 1986).  From the animals, nevertheless, the communication related to epigenetic qualities amid organism relevant generations have, been obvious just use extremely delicate hereditary analyses (Chong & Whitelaw, 2004). The agouti locus from mouse, which distresses colour of coat, is by far well studied illustration, actuality pretentious from degree of methylation at DNA level at a given upstream direction of transposon. Hereditarily undistinguishable agouti gene bearing parents are in dissimilar epigenetic related conditions incline to harvest descendants with diverse colours (Bird, 2007).

Learning of genes through experience

Numerous research findings have described the environmental associations to wide term standing epigenetic properties of physical appearance. The epigenetics, though, is that twins of monozygotic nature like not to do continuously display the similar ailment vulnerability, floating likelihood about science of epigenetic related alterations (Wong et al., 2005). It has been found that the twins of fledgling nature are alike quantities of methylation levels of DNA while grownup twin brothers fluctuate significantly in quantities also designs related to this alteration (Fraga et al., 2005). Main wide ranging and clear examination of  methylation sequence of human DNA configurations as for now-off established that chromosome 3 harboring 873 genes exhibited null momentous dissimilarity in methylation level of DNA amongst persons in the half of 20s and of 60s (Eckhardt et al., 2006). It has been found that specific mother related fostering in mice amends methylation level of the given gene encrypting glucocorticoid receptor (Weaver et al., 2004). The study suggested the nonappearance from suitable fostering, presented fewer addition of CH3 of the specific gene from hippocampus, ensuing higher level of expression from the protein of receptor present in advanced life (Anway et al., 2005). Transformed methylation pattern of DNA was over recommended by way of possible arbitrator from consequence, problems in growth, embryos related to mammalian permit over an intensely situation of over methylation, which could be anticipated towards endanger the genetics of these kind of  mutations.

Epigenetics and its role in inheritance

The prerequisite for epigenetic mechanisms which are contagious over meiosis or mitosis includes the chromatin biology, counting composite linguistic from marks of chromatin, belongings of  RNA transcription and  interference and the properties of the higher level construction of nucleus containing  chromosome (Bird, 2007). It is disadvantage that it does not sit fit effortlessly along with usual traditional descriptions. One main reason for which is being the numerous chromatin characters are not lived for so long. Like instance, addition of phosphate group on the irregular H2AX region of histone subsequently disruption on double stranded will succeed as beyond genetic mechanism spot below emergent delineation, but it also fleeting en route to be suitable by way of a genetic and beyond genetic  mark (Rogakou et al., 1999). Alterations in chromosomal protein related along with RNA synthesis are too vague through reverence with transmission of traits. In another pointer, addition of CH3 group to DNA shakes addition of CH3 and acetylene to histone, in this way these adjustments could be observed equally genetically and beyond genetics, indirectly (Klose & Bird, 2006). In another instance these chromosomal proteins inscriptions could also become outcome after measures which appear toward include none of polycom protein nor the DNA with added methyl group, so the results do not become unavoidably infectious. So, a sole histone adjustment can, within code, be regarded by way of any heritable or not traditional way of heritability or not epigenetic rendering to the inheritance related identifications from its source. A complex mechanism like this will be having incomplete usefulness. The subject of duplication correctness remains pertinent at the time of heritability observation. The mixture of DNA remains enormously precise, creating just single un-imposed miscalculation for each of the given bases (Kunkel, 2004). Then addition of methyl group on DNA has an ostensible correctness upto 96%, which is quite equivalent to near about 1 error encountered after every 25 locations which are methylated hackneyed (Laird et al., 2004). Since of this slip degree, cloning originating from a given only one cell rapidly consequences from a populace of living cells in which addition of methyl groups on DNA decorations become varied (Silva et al., 1993). Spheres with added methyl groups are very sturdily preserved, although full position with methylated spots diverges inside those. Then peloric also irregular belonging to toadflax which is a then faultless specimen of genetic epigenetics in act, spectacles substantial variability as the plant propagates. So how precisely conveyed should an epigenetic stain be? Disparity outstanding to damaged doubling is mingled with present sign complete chromosomal protein adjustments, and also addition of methyl group to DNA itself, could be tersely aloof through growth, thus foiling the doggedness of these revisions in a transmissible epigenetic logic (Hong et al., 2005).

Forensic science, which is also recognized as a science of criminalistics, is the presentation of science to wrong and civil laws, mostly on the criminal side throughout unlawful examination, as administered by the legal values of allowable indication and criminal technique (EDU, 2015). Forensic scientists gather, reserve, and examine scientific evidence in the course of an investigation. While some forensic scientists foldaway to the scene of the crime to assemble the evidence themselves, others lodge a laboratory character, executing examination on matters taken to them by other individuals (Vidaki

 & Kayser, 2018). Forensic science is a blend of two unlike Latin words: forensis and science. The earlier, forensic, recounts to an argument or inspection completed in community. Since judgments in the prehistoric world were characteristically detained in open, it transmits a robust judicial implication. The additional is science, which is consequential from the Latin word for 'knowledge' and is today carefully knotted to the scientific technique, a methodical way of obtaining knowledge. Occupied composed, then, forensic science can be gotten as the usage of the scientific procedures and courses in crime resolving.

Epigenetics and forensic

Forensic epigenetics, i.e., examining epigenetics difference to determine forensically pertinent queries insoluble with normal forensic DNA sketching has been ahead considerable pounded above the last few years. Distinctive DNA methylation amongst tissues and persons has been planned as valuable reserve for three forensic uses i) defining the tissue kind of a human biological touch, ii) approximating the oldness of an unidentified smidgeon contributor, and iii) discriminating among monozygotic doubles. Therefore distant, forensic epigenetic inquiries have secondhand a extensive variety of approaches for CpG marker detection, forecast demonstrating and besieged DNA methylation examination, all coming with rewards and drawbacks when it comes to forensic trace examination (Satta et al., 2008). Though, the enduring molecular retorts to the ‘dynamic’ setting via regulating DNA methylation heights crossways of the genome, subsequent in separate epigenomic difference (Song et al., 2009; Madi et al., 2012), also mentioned to as epigenetic impression, is also pertinent in the forensic field (Vidaki et al., 2015; Zolotarenko et al., 2019).

Discovering DNA sequence difference in the procedure repetitive DNA segment  like short tandem repeat (STRs) or beyond point mutation like single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) has remained a commanding reserve in forensic genetics for categorizing individuals, like sufferers and wrongdoers of crime, from minor and slighter human biological evidence (Kayser and De Knijff, 2011). Though fewer recognized thus far, SNPs can also be cast-off in DNA-based forensic intellect to forecast unidentified persons’ look characters and biogeographical ancestry, which can assist discovery unidentified committers of corruption who, in belief, cannot be recognized with normal forensic DNA sketching (Kayser, 2015; Philips, 2015). Composed with travelling genetic alteration, the added examination of epigenetic dissimilarity mostly DNA methylation modifications between CpG sites

 has added considerable ground in the forensic field over the last few years (Vidaki et al., 2017; Kadar et al., 2015; Lee et al., 2016). Meanwhile its first forensic outline for sex fortitude in 1993, discrepancy DNA methylation configurations have been frequently calculated for three forensically applicable explanations: i) to recognize the tissue/cell-type basis of DNA evidence ii) to estimation of an individual’s oldness and iii) to discriminate amongst monozygotic twins (Naito et al., 1993; Sijen, 2015; Philips et al., 2017; Vidaki et al., 2017). In distinction to heredities and science behind the genetics remained discovered sluggishly in the field of forensic science (Naito et al., 1993; Vidaki et al., 2013). Methylation of DNA is favored in field of forensics above extra beyond genetic alterations for together in lab research constancy along with extraordinary compassion within rapports from DNA quantities are prerequisite. Now, solely incomplete amount of CH3 groups on DNA indicators smeared aimed at insufficient field of forensic resolutions, making use of skills which allow examination belonging a minor amount from these kinds of markers. Such methods could be categorized as epigenetics related to forensic science, and comprise methylation of DNA reporting aimed at tissue resolve, oldness forecast along with diversity among twins of monozygotic nature (Lee et al., 2016; Vidaki et al., 2017).

The scientists envisage formation from an “epigenomic fingerprint” as of scene of crime happening hints like encouraging methodology towards discourse numerous forensic science related queries that go without an answer via genetics. Moreover, the scientists of this field imagine the nearby upcoming original machineries would be advanced towards permission of the discovery of wide level of methylation of DNA disparity in forensic science related DNA for countless additional forensic science drives (Vidaki et al., 2015). Existing DNA related forensic sketching remains totally relative; the purposes of which is towards contest DNA outlines on or after scene related to crime drops to a higher recognized defendants, which are encompassed in databases relevant to forensic DNA typing(Jobling & Gill, 2004; Kayser & de Knijff, 2011). Condition placed in repetition, these extended on the basis of DNA intellect remains projected towards monitor police inquiries to the utmost expected cluster of possible defendants (Kayser, 2015; Philips, 2015).

Need of epigenetic analysis in forensic

There are numerous necessities of DNA analysis for forensic science applications, such necessities too smear to epigenomic and epigenetic types of forensic types examines. Furthermore, there are additional technical contests specified the measurable consequence of epigenomic and epigenetic type of  investigation, within distinction to genetics of forensic science and its examination, which is of qualitative type (Vidaki et al., 2017; Weber-Lehmann et al., 2015). By the similar spell, recent beyond the genetics type of examination tools which remain capable towards covenant through less quantity and quality of DNA like quantitative PCR to measure level of methylation, pyrosequencing of bisulphite manner besides EPITYPER®, remain partial within their volumes of multiplexing, which are frequently inadequate to fully discourse a forensic query of attention (Olkhov-Mitsel & Bapat, 2012). Quantities relevant to DNA got on the location of scene of crime happening drops remain habitually stumpy, classically within the nanogram to picrogram variety. Approaches such as methylation snapshot with (albeit limited) multiplexing capability presently have thoughtfulness down to a small number of nanograms of DNA contribution for each PCR (Kaminsky & Petronis, 2009). Though, most present epigenetic practices need bisulfite adaptation proceeding to marker study; the competence of adapting unmethylated cytosines into uracils muscularly hinge on the DNA contribution. Naturally, bisulfite alteration kits necessitate a smallest of 50–200 ng DNA for unswerving enactment (Vidaki et al., 2017). Crime scenes traces can contain of dissimilar cell sorts. Though cell/tissue-type preparation is characteristically not defensive in hereditary examination, it can be inspiring in epigenetic study. Forensic epigenetic studies have to implant likewise fit in all forensically pertinent cell or tissue sorts or, if that is unbearable, need to be custom-made to exact tissue kinds, needful tissue-type fortitude preceding to epigenetic analysis. Certain DNA methylation spots can demonstrate considerable alterations among diverse tissues, which desire to be measured when smearing beforehand recognized extrapolative marker groups and likelihood replicas to a trace, which can be of an altered tissue foundation (Holtkötter et al., 2017; Heyn et al., 2013). Straight if a big number of epigenetic markers deliver tissue-independent material, such as for age forecast, plummeting the number of markers owing to mechanical obliges in forensic DNA scrutiny can prime to tissue specificity properties such as in forensic age estimation (Horvath, 2013). Defining forensically related tissue kinds can be accomplished through tissue-specific mRNA or microRNA markers, which was previously reputable in forensics (Du et al., 2015).

If the deduction of the epigenetic examination rest on a straight judgment amongst crime scene measureable and reference models, samples from the identical tissue category should be recycled. Though, supplementary contests in clarification can be met when examining varied forensic-type samples such as entire blood, containing of dissimilar cell kinds with separate epigenomes (Yet et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2013). Once it emanates to prognostic DNA analysis in forensics, the correctness of forecasting a peculiarity from DNA, counting methylation markers. Possible perplexing DNA methylation possessions produced by a mixture of issues such as age or ecological acquaintances should also be occupied into interpretation during understanding, and correctly tested before application (Zilbauer et al., 2013). Though, forensic DNA forecast is normally functional in cases wherever the police have slight or no information of the distinctiveness of the trace contributor and in what way to catch him/her. Later, though extraordinary likelihood exactitudes are commonly favored in forensic DNA estimate, encompassing when DNA methylation markers are used, inferior precisions may be putative given what is recognized in an exact case and if other evidence obtainable to the police at present has squat or unidentified precisions (Van Dongen et al., 2107; Vidaki et al., 2017).

Recent developments in forensic epigenetics

Alongside with ordinary DNA profiling, familiarity concerning the cell or tissue type(s) of the crime scene trace can deliver decisive evidence for crime scene rebuilding, subsequently detailed tissues specify kinds of movement. Meanwhile epigenetics is complicated in cell diversity and gene countenance directive, classifying forensically applicable body solutions is conceivable consuming differentially methylated loci (Song et al., 2009; Frumkin et al., 2011) first decorated the prospective of epigenetic markers for semen trace resolve. Then, numerous readings have been circulated by means of numerous DNA methylation loci and examination methods for dissimilar forensically applicable tissues (Madi et al., 2012; Vidaki et al., 2016).

Determination of trace donors through epigenetics

The dependable epigenetic grit of additional multifaceted body solutions such as menstrual blood can be extra stimulating, mostly owing to the mixture of dissimilar cell types and slighter methylation belongings of presently predictable markers (Lee et al., 2016). Non-commercial multiplex test schemes directing numerous soft tissue concurrently have been issued lately (Lee et al., 2016; Varley et al., 2013), but presently have not been authenticated for recognition in court. Notwithstanding the very current outline of such quizzes to criminal casework in certain countries, forthcoming investigation concerning both marker’s specificity transversely as an extensive variety of materials, inter- and intra-individual difference, in vitro steadiness, gender, age and/or ancestry linked effects, as well as full valuation and validation of the planned multiplex forensic coordinations, scraps essential to completely inaugurate concrete practicality in criminal casework (Breitling et al., 2011; Freire-Aradas et al., 2017; Vidaki & Kayser, 2017) have emphasized better dissimilarity in acknowledged age versus age foretold with DNA methylation markers for children and ageing people, comparative to medium-aged people. This may exemplify the inconsistencies between genetic and consecutive age as noticed with epigenetic markers, which are predictable to be greater throughout developing generation and with progressive age associated with medium-aged individuals. Though, most committers of crime are of intermediate age. Forensically appropriate profitable resolutions are at present not accessible in spite of the snowballing awareness from police forces universally. However, we believe that supplementary examination and validation trainings will categorize robust markers that ultimately will be assembled laidback in multiplex explanations for age approximation from crime scene traces (Kovatsi et al., 2015; Sauer et al., 2016).

Identification of Twins

Monozygotic (MZ) twins cannot be separately recognized through normal forensic DNA analysis since they stake the identical DNA profile, which is a disadvantage for law implementation. For a facility founded on ultra-deep complete genome sequencing to distinguish very occasional somatic mutations (Li et al., 2013; Lindenbergh et al., 2012). Even though some researchers have discovered the worth of epigenetic summarizing in forensically discerning MZ twins it is not up till now completely recognized whether the perceived twin-to-twin metamorphoses are twin pair-specific, or influence be universal and appropriate crosswise twin pairs, as would be favored (Li et al., 2013; Du et al., 2015). In recent times, a first attempt was finished to validate the likelihood of distinguishing amongst MZ twins consuming forensic epigenetics (Vikadi et al., 2017). DNA methylation adjustments over time and dissimilar tissues, expertise, and methodologies will conclude whether variance DNA methylation is undeniably a appropriate methodology for addressing this forensic problem (Lee et al., 2016).

Future Potential of forensic epigenetics

Notwithstanding tobacco smoking being extensively documented as having deleterious health consequences, a large amount of the world residents immobile smokes: for instance, 19–32% of Europeans (Eurostat, 2017). Smoking is recognized to effect DNA impairment and telomere restriction, and also epigenetic vicissitudes, which are produced by properties on DNA methyltransferase appearance and DNA methylation decorations (Houseman et al., 2012; Huang et al., 2013). Forthcoming experimentations are also desirable to regulate whether epigenetic alterations are predicted only in the brain, or whether these are also measureable in forensically more pertinent tissues, such as blood. Finally, drug dose-dependent and rescindable paraphernalia are also projected (Vikadi et al., 2016; Linnér et al., 2017). We imagine that forthcoming large-scale epigenomic investigation of dissimilar diet groups, such as fruitarians against non-vegetarians, might permit the building of extrapolation prototypes that have the prospective to be recycled in forensic applications. In divergence to hereditary data in forensic DNA sketching, and as with hereditary data from exterior and lineage extrapolation, epigenetic/epigenomic data from existence likelihood are not deposited in fundamental forensic databases. Only the mannerism figures, but no concrete genetic/epigenetic data, would be interconnected to the police for usage in examinations. Ethical and communal questions of probabilistic epigenomic standard of living likelihood ought be conferred between interdisciplinary assemblages of connoisseurs, comprising councils with epigenetics, law experts, social, ethics and forensic, formerly applied presentations can be deliberated.

Conclusion

Forensic science has revolutionized the criminal investigation and set it on scientific routes. By this, true implication of law has been assured without wrongful arrests, error free investigation and transparent judgment. Forensic epigenetics is modern fields with a lot aspects related to crime scene and criminal investigations by providing answers to every primary and basic levels of questions. Also it has provided solution to problems which were not possible with traditional DNA based techniques e.g. discriminations of monozygotic twins. This field has many prolific prospects for criminal investigation. It not only itself useful in sorting out many criminal investigations but also aids in use methods and techniques of forensic science. The future also is quite promising as far as solution to such investigation related problems is concerned.

Conflict of interest

The authors declared absence of conflict of interest.

References

Anway, M. D., Cupp, A. S., Uzumcu, M., & Skinner, M. K. (2005). Epigenetic transgenerational actions of endocrine disruptors and male fertility. science308(5727), 1466-1469.

Bird, A. (2007). Perceptions of epigenetics. Nature447(7143), 396.

Breitling, L. P., Yang, R., Korn, B., Burwinkel, B., & Brenner, H. (2011). Tobacco-smoking-related differential DNA methylation: 27K discovery and replication. The American Journal of Human Genetics88(4), 450-457.

Chong, S., & Whitelaw, E. (2004). Epigenetic germline inheritance. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development14(6), 692-696.

Du, Q., Zhu, G., Fu, G., Zhang, X., Fu, L., Li, S., & Cong, B. (2015). A genome-wide scan of DNA methylation markers for distinguishing monozygotic twins. Twin Research and Human Genetics18(6), 670-679.

Eckhardt, F., Lewin, J., Cortese, R., Rakyan, V. K., Attwood, J., Burger, M., ... & Beck, S. (2006). DNA methylation profiling of human chromosomes 6, 20 and 22. Nature genetics38(12), 1378-1385.

EDU,  (2015). Crime Scene Investigator, Archived from the original on 6 September 2015.

Eurostat (2017). Tobacco consumption statistics. explained/index.php/Tobacco_consumption_statistics.http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics.

Fraga, M. F., Ballestar, E., Paz, M. F., Ropero, S., Setien, F., Ballestar, M. L., ... & Esteller, M. (2005). Epigenetic differences arise during the lifetime of monozygotic twins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences102(30), 10604-10609.

Freire-Aradas, A., Phillips, C., & Lareu, M. V. (2017). Forensic individual age estimation with DNA: from initial approaches to methylation tests. Forensic Science Review29(2).

Frumkin, D., Wasserstrom, A., Budowle, B., & Davidson, A. (2011). DNA methylation-based forensic tissue identification. Forensic Science International: Genetics5(5), 517-524.

Heyn, H., Moran, S., Hernando-Herraez, I., Sayols, S., Gomez, A., Sandoval, J., & Esteller, M. (2013). DNA methylation contributes to natural human variation. Genome research23(9), 1363-1372.

Holtkötter, H., Beyer, V., Schwender, K., Glaub, A., Johann, K. S., Schürenkamp, M., ... & EUROFORGEN-NoE Consortium. (2017). Independent validation of body fluid-specific CpG markers and construction of a robust multiplex assay. Forensic Science International: Genetics29, 261-268.

Hong, E. J., West, A. E., & Greenberg, M. E. (2005). Transcriptional control of cognitive development. Current opinion in neurobiology15(1), 21-28.

Horvath, S. (2013). DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biology14(10), 1-20.

Houseman, E. A., Accomando, W. P., Koestler, D. C., Christensen, B. C., Marsit, C. J., Nelson, H. H., ... & Kelsey, K. T. (2012). DNA methylation arrays as surrogate measures of cell mixture distribution. BMC Bioinformatics13(1), 1-16.

Huang, J., Okuka, M., Lu, W., Tsibris, J. C., McLean, M. P., Keefe, D. L., & Liu, L. (2013). Telomere shortening and DNA damage of embryonic stem cells induced by cigarette smoke. Reproductive Toxicology35, 89-95.

Jeggo, P. A., & Holliday, R. (1986). Azacytidine-induced reactivation of a DNA repair gene in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Molecular and Cellular Biology6(8), 2944-2949.

Jobling, M. A., & Gill, P. (2004). Encoded evidence: DNA in forensic analysis. Nature Reviews Genetics5(10), 739-751.

Kader, F. and Ghai, M. (2015). DNA methylation and application in forensic sciences. Forensic Sci. Int. 249:pp.255-265.

Kaminsky, Z., & Petronis, A. (2009). Methylation SNaPshot: a method for the quantification of site-specific DNA methylation levels. In DNA Methylation (pp. 241-255). Humana Press.

Kayser, M. (2015). Forensic DNA phenotyping: predicting human appearance from crime scene material for investigative purposes. Forensic Science International: Genetics18, 33-48.

Kayser, M., & De Knijff, P. (2011). Improving human forensics through advances in genetics, genomics and molecular biology. Nature Reviews Genetics12(3), 179-192.

Klose, R. J., & Bird, A. P. (2006). Genomic DNA methylation: the mark and its mediators. Trends in Biochemical Sciences31(2), 89-97.

Kovatsi, L., Vidaki, A., & Fragou, D. (2015). Syndercombe Court D. Epigenetic fingerprint. Personalised epigenetics. 1st ed. USA: Elsevier, 221-43.

Kunkel, T. A. (2004). DNA replication fidelity. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 279:16895–16898.

Laird, C. D., Pleasant, N. D., Clark, A. D., Sneeden, J. L., Hassan, K. A., Manley, N. C., ... & Stöger, R. (2004). Hairpin-bisulfite PCR: assessing epigenetic methylation patterns on complementary strands of individual DNA molecules. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences101(1), 204-209.

Lee, H. Y., Lee, S. D., & Shin, K. J. (2016). Forensic DNA methylation profiling from evidence material for investigative leads. BMB Reports49(7), 359.

Li, C., Zhao, S., Zhang, N., Zhang, S., & Hou, Y. (2013). Differences of DNA methylation profiles between monozygotic twins’ blood samples. Molecular Biology Reports40(9), 5275-5280.

Lindenbergh, A., de Pagter, M., Ramdayal, G., Visser, M., Zubakov, D., Kayser, M., & Sijen, T. (2012). A multiplex (m) RNA-profiling system for the forensic identification of body fluids and contact traces. Forensic Science International: Genetics6(5), 565-577.

Linnér, R. K., Marioni, R. E., Rietveld, C. A., Simpkin, A. J., Davies, N. M., Watanabe, K., ... & Benjamin, D. J. (2017). An epigenome-wide association study meta-analysis of educational attainment. Molecular Psychiatry22(12), 1680-1690.

Madi, T., Balamurugan, K., Bombardi, R., Duncan, G., & McCord, B. (2012). The determination of tissuespecific DNA methylation patterns in forensic biofluids using bisulfite modification and pyrosequencingElectrophoresis33(12), 1736-1745.

Naito, E., Dewa, K., Yamanouchi, H., Takagi, S., & Kominami, R. (1993). Sex determination using the hypomethylation of a human macro-satellite DXZ4 in female cells. Nucleic acids research21(10), 2533.

OlkhovMitsel, E., & Bapat, B. (2012). Strategies for discovery and validation of methylated and hydroxymethylated DNA biomarkers. Cancer medicine1(2), 237-260.

Phillips, C. (2015). Forensic genetic analysis of bio-geographical ancestry. Forensic Science International: Genetics18, 49-65.

Riggs, A. D., Suzuki, H., & Bourgeois, S. (1970). lac repressor-operator interaction: I. Equilibrium studies. Journal of Molecular Biology48(1), 67-83.

Rogakou, E. P., Boon, C., Redon, C., & Bonner, W. M. (1999). Megabase chromatin domains involved in DNA double-strand breaks in vivo. Journal of Cell Biology146(5), 905-916.

Russo, V. E., Martienssen, R. A., & Riggs, A. D. (1996). Epigenetic mechanisms of gene regulation. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

Satta, R., Maloku, E., Zhubi, A., Pibiri, F., Hajos, M., Costa, E., & Guidotti, A. (2008). Nicotine decreases DNA methyltransferase 1 expression and glutamic acid decarboxylase 67 promoter methylation in GABAergic interneuronsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences105(42), 16356-16361.

Sauer, E., Reinke, A. K., & Courts, C. (2016). Differentiation of five body fluids from forensic samples by expression analysis of four microRNAs using quantitative PCR. Forensic Science International: Genetics22, 89-99.

Sijen, T. (2015). Molecular approaches for forensic cell type identification: on mRNA, miRNA, DNA methylation and microbial markers. Forensic Science International: Genetics18, 21-32.

Silva, A. J., Ward, K., & White, R. (1993). Mosaic methylation in clonal tissue. Developmental Biology156(2), 391-398.

Song, F., Mahmood, S., Ghosh, S., Liang, P., Smiraglia, D. J., Nagase, H., & Held, W. A. (2009). Tissue specific differentially methylated regions (TDMR): Changes in DNA methylation during development. Genomics93(2), 130-139.

Van Dongen, J., Nivard, M. G., Willemsen, G., Hottenga, J. J., Helmer, Q., Dolan, C. V., ... & Boomsma, D. I. (2016). Genetic and environmental influences interact with age and sex in shaping the human methylomeNature Communications7(1), 1-13.

Varley, K. E., Gertz, J., Bowling, K. M., Parker, S. L., Reddy, T. E., Pauli-Behn, F., ... & Myers, R. M. (2013). Dynamic DNA methylation across diverse human cell lines and tissues. Genome Research23(3), 555-567.

Vidaki, A., & Kayser, M. (2017). From forensic epigenetics to forensic epigenomics: broadening DNA investigative intelligence. Genome biology18(1), 1-13.

Vidaki, A., & Kayser, M. (2018). Recent progress, methods and perspectives in forensic epigenetics. Forensic Science International: Genetics37, 180-195.

Vidaki, A., Daniel, B., & Court, D. S. (2013). Forensic DNA methylation profiling—potential opportunities and challenges. Forensic Science International: Genetics7(5), 499-507.

Vidaki, A., Giangasparo, F., & Syndercombe Court, D. (2016). Discovery of potential DNA methylation markers for forensic tissue identification using bisulphite pyrosequencing. Electrophoresis37(21), 2767-2779.

Vidaki, A., López, C. D., Carnero-Montoro, E., Ralf, A., Ward, K., Spector, T., & Kayser, M. (2017). Epigenetic discrimination of identical twins from blood under the forensic scenario. Forensic Science International: Genetics31, 67-80.

Waddington, C.H. (1957). (Allen & Unwin, London, 1957). The Strategy of the Genes. George Allen & Unwin, Ltd.

Weaver, I. C., Cervoni, N., Champagne, F. A., D'Alessio, A. C., Sharma, S., Seckl, J. R., ... & Meaney, M. J. (2004). Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior. Nature Neuroscience7(8), 847-854.

Weber-Lehmann, J., Schilling, E., Gradl, G., Richter, D. C., Wiehler, J., & Rolf, B. (2014). Finding the needle in the haystack: differentiating “identical” twins in paternity testing and forensics by ultra-deep next generation sequencing. Forensic Science International: Genetics9, 42-46.

Wong, A. H., Gottesman, I. I., & Petronis, A. (2005). Phenotypic differences in genetically identical organisms: the epigenetic perspective. Human Molecular Genetics14(suppl_1), R11-R18.

Wong, A. H., Gottesman, I. I., & Petronis, A. (2005). Phenotypic differences in genetically identical organisms: the epigenetic perspective. Human molecular genetics14(suppl_1), R11-R18.

Yet, I., Tsai, P. C., Castillo-Fernandez, J. E., Carnero-Montoro, E., & Bell, J. T. (2016). Genetic and environmental impacts on DNA methylation levels in twins. Epigenomics8(1), 105-117.

Zbieć-Piekarska, R., Spólnicka, M., Kupiec, T., Parys-Proszek, A., Makowska, Ż., Pałeczka, A., ... & Branicki, W. (2015). Development of a forensically useful age prediction method based on DNA methylation analysis. Forensic Science International: Genetics17, 173-179.

Zhang, B., Zhou, Y., Lin, N., Lowdon, R. F., Hong, C., Nagarajan, R. P., ... & Wang, T. (2013). Functional DNA methylation differences between tissues, cell types, and across individuals discovered using the M&M algorithm. Genome Research23(9), 1522-1540.

Zilbauer, M., Rayner, T. F., Clark, C., Coffey, A. J., Joyce, C. J., Palta, P., ... & Smith, K. G. (2013). Genome-wide methylation analyses of primary human leukocyte subsets identifies functionally important cell-type–specific hypomethylated regions. Blood122(25), e52-e60.

Zolotarenko, A. D., Chekalin, E. V., & Bruskin, S. A. (2019). Modern Molecular Genetic Methods for Age Estimation in Forensics. Russian Journal of Genetics55(12), 1460-1471.