Biological and Clinical
Sciences Research Journal
ISSN:
2708-2261
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47264/bcsrj0201011
Biol. Clin. Sci. Res. J.,
Volume, 2021: e011
Review Article
APPLICATIONS OF
EPIGENETICS IN FORENSIC INVESTIGATIONS: A BRIEF REVIEW
ULLAH
RA1*, ALI A1, HUSSAIN N2, MALIK A1
Institute of Molecular
Biology and Biotechnology, The University of Lahore,
Lahore Pakistan
Centre for Applied Molecular
Biology, University the Punjab Lahore, Lahore Pakistan
Corresponding author email: ranajaved190@gmail.com
Abstract
Forensic
science is a discipline that has the capacity to be merged with every promise
to offer a solution to a criminal investigation to help the legal system.
Epigenetics is a branch of genetics that deals with the study of environmental
interaction with the genome. The emerging field of forensic epigenetics has a
variety of applications in criminal investigations. It provides an addictive
tool to solve criminal activity-related issues. In this review, we have
showcased the brief use of epigenetics to sort out forensic-related issues and help
the legal system. We have briefly taken a snapshot of genetics, epigenetics,
and application of epigenetics in forensic science that how it could offer
solutions to queries of forensic nature. Also, potential future developments in
the field and their probable impact have been anticipated. It has many
potential applications which are still to be explored. It complements forensic
science at many potential levels.
Keywords: epigenetics,
forensic, methylation, chromatin, acetylation
Introduction
Geneticists revise the
protein encoding sequence; though, for epigenetic experts, there is no clear
'epigenetic'. Yet, during the previous year, beyond the published 2,500
research articles, plentiful science based conferences and quite new scientific
publishing books have also been dedicated to theme relevant to epigenetics. There has been continuity as far as a
possibility in the field of biology aimed at confrontations which has
dissimilar senses for variety of people. Epigenetics
presents a thrilling instance, just because it presents numerous connotations
through autonomous heritages. As far as Conrad Waddington is concerned, it had
been learning the basic epigenesis: which entails
that by which methods genotypes pave pay for emergence of phenotypes throughout
growth (Bird, 2007). Through disparity, Riggs and coworkers demarcated epigenetics by way of “the study of mitotically
and/or meiotically transmissible variations in gene
purpose that cannot be elucidated by fluctuations in DNA sequence” (Riggs et al., 1970). In additional arguments,
heritage, nonetheless in a way as scientists of today figure it out. The
presented descriptions vary evidently, though these are frequently conflated
the way as still these are mentioned in a single spectacle. The term coined by
Waddington includes the bustle of
altogether progressive biology experts who learn in what way gene action
through growth reasons phenotype to arise, nonetheless it gets hurts by the
drawback that progressive biology experts seldom, uncertainty always, custom
this kind of code to define their arena (Waddington, 1957).
The description made by
Riggs plus his associates expresses whatever epigenetic discipline does not;
parting exposed whatever brands of machinery are functional. In that scientific
writing, author given instances in way which describes that in what way
epigenetic marvels remain calculated besides understood, also he suggested a
reviewed explanation which exemplifies modern custom of the term (Russo et al., 1996). The kind of molecular
foundation of genetic and epigenetics had remained
considered in diversity among all of organisms. The methylation
of DNA and the Polycomb structures originate
contiguous to perfect, since adjustments in the given genome present frequently
inborn via succeeding peers from cells also occasionally living organisms (Jeggo & Holiday, 1986). From the animals,
nevertheless, the communication related to epigenetic qualities amid organism
relevant generations have, been obvious just use extremely delicate hereditary
analyses (Chong & Whitelaw, 2004). The agouti locus from mouse, which
distresses colour of coat, is by far well studied
illustration, actuality pretentious from degree of methylation
at DNA level at a given upstream direction of transposon.
Hereditarily undistinguishable agouti gene bearing parents are in dissimilar
epigenetic related conditions incline to harvest descendants with diverse colours (Bird, 2007).
Learning of genes through
experience
Numerous research findings
have described the environmental associations to wide term standing epigenetic
properties of physical appearance. The epigenetics,
though, is that twins of monozygotic nature like not to do continuously display
the similar ailment vulnerability, floating likelihood about science of
epigenetic related alterations (Wong et
al., 2005). It has been found that the twins of fledgling nature are alike
quantities of methylation levels of DNA while grownup
twin brothers fluctuate significantly in quantities also designs related to
this alteration (Fraga et al., 2005). Main wide ranging and clear examination of methylation
sequence of human DNA configurations as for now-off established that chromosome
3 harboring 873 genes exhibited null momentous dissimilarity in methylation level of DNA amongst persons in the half of 20s
and of 60s (Eckhardt et al.,
2006). It has been found that specific mother
related fostering in mice amends methylation level of
the given gene encrypting glucocorticoid receptor (Weaver
et al., 2004). The study suggested the nonappearance from suitable fostering,
presented fewer addition of CH3 of the specific gene from
hippocampus, ensuing higher level of expression from the protein of receptor
present in advanced life (Anway et al., 2005). Transformed methylation pattern of DNA was
over recommended by way of possible arbitrator from consequence, problems in
growth, embryos related to mammalian permit over an intensely situation of over
methylation, which could be anticipated towards
endanger the genetics of these kind of
mutations.
Epigenetics and
its role in inheritance
The prerequisite for
epigenetic mechanisms which are contagious over meiosis or mitosis includes the
chromatin biology, counting composite linguistic from marks of chromatin,
belongings of RNA transcription and interference and the properties of the higher
level construction of nucleus containing
chromosome (Bird, 2007). It is disadvantage that it does not sit fit
effortlessly along with usual traditional descriptions. One main reason for
which is being the numerous chromatin characters are not lived for so long.
Like instance, addition of phosphate group on the irregular H2AX
region of histone subsequently disruption on double
stranded will succeed as beyond genetic mechanism spot below emergent
delineation, but it also fleeting en route to be suitable by way of a genetic
and beyond genetic mark (Rogakou et al., 1999). Alterations in
chromosomal protein related along with RNA synthesis are too vague through
reverence with transmission of traits. In another pointer, addition of CH3
group to DNA shakes addition of CH3 and acetylene to histone, in this way these adjustments could be observed
equally genetically and beyond genetics, indirectly (Klose
& Bird, 2006). In another instance these chromosomal proteins inscriptions
could also become outcome after measures which appear toward include none of polycom protein nor the DNA with added methyl group, so the
results do not become unavoidably infectious. So, a sole histone
adjustment can, within code, be regarded by way of any heritable or not
traditional way of heritability or not epigenetic rendering to the inheritance
related identifications from its source. A complex mechanism like this will be
having incomplete usefulness. The subject of duplication correctness remains pertinent
at the time of heritability observation. The mixture of DNA remains enormously
precise, creating just single un-imposed miscalculation for each of the given
bases (Kunkel, 2004). Then addition of methyl group on DNA has an ostensible
correctness upto ∼96%, which is quite
equivalent to near about ∼1
error encountered after every 25 locations which are methylated
hackneyed (Laird et al., 2004). Since
of this slip degree, cloning originating from a given only one cell rapidly
consequences from a populace of living cells in which addition of methyl groups
on DNA decorations become varied (Silva et
al., 1993). Spheres with added methyl groups are very sturdily preserved,
although full position with methylated spots diverges
inside those. Then peloric also irregular belonging
to toadflax which is a then faultless specimen of genetic epigenetics
in act, spectacles substantial variability as the plant propagates. So how
precisely conveyed should an epigenetic stain be? Disparity outstanding to
damaged doubling is mingled with present sign complete chromosomal protein
adjustments, and also addition of methyl group to DNA itself, could be tersely
aloof through growth, thus foiling the doggedness of these revisions in a
transmissible epigenetic logic (Hong et
al., 2005).
Forensic science, which is also recognized as a science of criminalistics, is the presentation of science to wrong and civil laws, mostly on the criminal side throughout unlawful examination, as administered by the legal values of allowable indication and criminal technique (EDU, 2015). Forensic scientists gather, reserve, and examine scientific evidence in the course of an investigation. While some forensic scientists foldaway to the scene of the crime to assemble the evidence themselves, others lodge a laboratory character, executing examination on matters taken to them by other individuals (Vidaki
& Kayser, 2018). Forensic science is a blend of two unlike Latin words: forensis and science. The earlier, forensic, recounts to an argument or inspection completed in community. Since judgments in the prehistoric world were characteristically detained in open, it transmits a robust judicial implication. The additional is science, which is consequential from the Latin word for 'knowledge' and is today carefully knotted to the scientific technique, a methodical way of obtaining knowledge. Occupied composed, then, forensic science can be gotten as the usage of the scientific procedures and courses in crime resolving.Epigenetics and
forensic
Forensic epigenetics,
i.e., examining epigenetics difference to determine
forensically pertinent queries insoluble with normal forensic DNA sketching has
been ahead considerable pounded above the last few years. Distinctive DNA methylation amongst tissues and persons has been planned as
valuable reserve for three forensic uses i) defining
the tissue kind of a human biological touch, ii) approximating the oldness of
an unidentified smidgeon contributor, and iii) discriminating among monozygotic
doubles. Therefore distant, forensic epigenetic inquiries have secondhand a extensive variety of approaches for CpG
marker detection, forecast demonstrating and besieged DNA methylation
examination, all coming with rewards and drawbacks when it comes to forensic
trace examination (Satta et al., 2008). Though, the enduring molecular retorts to the
‘dynamic’ setting via regulating DNA methylation
heights crossways of the genome, subsequent in separate epigenomic
difference (Song et al., 2009; Madi et al., 2012),
also mentioned to as epigenetic impression, is
also pertinent in the forensic field (Vidaki et al., 2015; Zolotarenko
et al., 2019).
Discovering DNA sequence difference in the procedure repetitive DNA segment like short tandem repeat (STRs) or beyond point mutation like single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) has remained a commanding reserve in forensic genetics for categorizing individuals, like sufferers and wrongdoers of crime, from minor and slighter human biological evidence (Kayser and De Knijff, 2011). Though fewer recognized thus far, SNPs can also be cast-off in DNA-based forensic intellect to forecast unidentified persons’ look characters and biogeographical ancestry, which can assist discovery unidentified committers of corruption who, in belief, cannot be recognized with normal forensic DNA sketching (Kayser, 2015; Philips, 2015). Composed with travelling genetic alteration, the added examination of epigenetic dissimilarity mostly DNA methylation modifications between CpG sites
has added considerable ground in the forensic field over the last few years (Vidaki et al., 2017; Kadar et al., 2015; Lee et al., 2016). Meanwhile its first forensic outline for sex fortitude in 1993, discrepancy DNA methylation configurations have been frequently calculated for three forensically applicable explanations: i) to recognize the tissue/cell-type basis of DNA evidence ii) to estimation of an individual’s oldness and iii) to discriminate amongst monozygotic twins (Naito et al., 1993; Sijen, 2015; Philips et al., 2017; Vidaki et al., 2017). In distinction to heredities and science behind the genetics remained discovered sluggishly in the field of forensic science (Naito et al., 1993; Vidaki et al., 2013). Methylation of DNA is favored in field of forensics above extra beyond genetic alterations for together in lab research constancy along with extraordinary compassion within rapports from DNA quantities are prerequisite. Now, solely incomplete amount of CH3 groups on DNA indicators smeared aimed at insufficient field of forensic resolutions, making use of skills which allow examination belonging a minor amount from these kinds of markers. Such methods could be categorized as epigenetics related to forensic science, and comprise methylation of DNA reporting aimed at tissue resolve, oldness forecast along with diversity among twins of monozygotic nature (Lee et al., 2016; Vidaki et al., 2017).The
scientists envisage formation
from an “epigenomic fingerprint” as of scene of crime
happening hints like encouraging methodology towards discourse numerous
forensic science related queries that go without an answer via genetics.
Moreover, the scientists of this field imagine the nearby upcoming original
machineries would be advanced towards permission of the discovery of wide level
of methylation of DNA disparity in forensic science
related DNA for countless additional forensic science drives (Vidaki et al.,
2015). Existing DNA related forensic sketching remains totally relative; the
purposes of which is towards contest DNA outlines on or after scene related to
crime drops to a higher recognized defendants, which are encompassed in
databases relevant to forensic DNA typing(Jobling
& Gill, 2004; Kayser & de Knijff,
2011). Condition placed in repetition, these extended on the basis of DNA
intellect remains projected towards monitor police inquiries to the utmost
expected cluster of possible defendants (Kayser,
2015; Philips, 2015).
Need of epigenetic analysis in forensic
There are numerous
necessities of DNA analysis for forensic science applications, such necessities
too smear to epigenomic and epigenetic types of
forensic types examines. Furthermore, there are additional technical contests
specified the measurable consequence of epigenomic
and epigenetic type of investigation,
within distinction to genetics of forensic science and its examination, which
is of qualitative type (Vidaki et
al., 2017; Weber-Lehmann
et al., 2015). By the similar spell, recent beyond the genetics type of examination
tools which remain capable towards covenant through less quantity and quality
of DNA like quantitative PCR to measure level of methylation,
pyrosequencing of bisulphite
manner besides EPITYPER®, remain partial within their volumes of multiplexing,
which are frequently inadequate to fully discourse a forensic query of
attention (Olkhov-Mitsel & Bapat,
2012). Quantities relevant to DNA got on the location of scene of crime
happening drops remain habitually stumpy, classically within the nanogram to picrogram variety.
Approaches such as methylation snapshot with (albeit limited)
multiplexing capability presently have thoughtfulness down to a small number of
nanograms of DNA contribution for each PCR (Kaminsky & Petronis, 2009).
Though, most present epigenetic practices need bisulfite
adaptation proceeding to marker study; the competence of adapting unmethylated cytosines into uracils muscularly hinge on the DNA contribution.
Naturally, bisulfite alteration kits necessitate a
smallest of 50–200 ng DNA for unswerving
enactment (Vidaki et al.,
2017). Crime scenes traces can contain
of dissimilar cell sorts. Though cell/tissue-type preparation is
characteristically not defensive in hereditary examination, it can be inspiring
in epigenetic study. Forensic epigenetic studies have to implant likewise fit
in all forensically pertinent cell or tissue sorts or, if that is unbearable,
need to be custom-made to exact tissue kinds, needful tissue-type fortitude
preceding to epigenetic analysis. Certain DNA methylation
spots can demonstrate considerable alterations among diverse tissues, which
desire to be measured when smearing beforehand recognized extrapolative marker
groups and likelihood replicas to a trace, which can be of an altered tissue
foundation (Holtkötter et al., 2017; Heyn et al., 2013). Straight if a big number of epigenetic markers deliver
tissue-independent material, such as for age forecast, plummeting
the number of markers owing to mechanical obliges in forensic DNA scrutiny can
prime to tissue specificity properties such as in forensic age estimation
(Horvath, 2013). Defining forensically related tissue kinds can be accomplished
through tissue-specific mRNA or microRNA markers,
which was previously reputable in forensics (Du et al., 2015).
If the deduction of
the epigenetic examination rest on a straight judgment amongst crime scene
measureable and reference models, samples from the identical tissue category
should be recycled. Though, supplementary contests in clarification can be met
when examining varied forensic-type samples such as entire blood, containing of
dissimilar cell kinds with separate epigenomes (Yet et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2013). Once it emanates to prognostic DNA analysis in
forensics, the correctness of forecasting a peculiarity from DNA, counting methylation markers. Possible perplexing DNA methylation possessions produced by a mixture of issues
such as age or ecological acquaintances should also be occupied into
interpretation during understanding, and correctly tested before application (Zilbauer et al., 2013). Though, forensic DNA forecast is normally functional in cases
wherever the police have slight or no information of the distinctiveness of the
trace contributor and in what way to catch him/her. Later, though extraordinary
likelihood exactitudes are commonly favored in forensic DNA estimate, encompassing
when DNA methylation markers are used, inferior
precisions may be putative given what is recognized in an exact case and if
other evidence obtainable to the police at present has squat or unidentified
precisions (Van Dongen et al., 2107; Vidaki et al.,
2017).
Recent developments in forensic epigenetics
Alongside with
ordinary DNA profiling, familiarity concerning the cell or tissue type(s) of
the crime scene trace can deliver decisive evidence for crime scene rebuilding,
subsequently detailed tissues specify kinds of movement. Meanwhile epigenetics is complicated in cell diversity and gene
countenance directive, classifying forensically applicable body solutions is
conceivable consuming differentially methylated loci
(Song et al., 2009; Frumkin et al.,
2011) first decorated the prospective of epigenetic markers for semen trace
resolve. Then, numerous readings have been circulated by means of numerous DNA methylation loci and examination methods for dissimilar
forensically applicable tissues (Madi et al., 2012; Vidaki
et al., 2016).
Determination of trace donors through epigenetics
The dependable
epigenetic grit of additional multifaceted body solutions such as menstrual
blood can be extra stimulating, mostly owing to the mixture of dissimilar cell
types and slighter methylation belongings of
presently predictable markers (Lee et al.,
2016). Non-commercial multiplex test schemes directing numerous soft tissue
concurrently have been issued lately (Lee et
al., 2016; Varley et al., 2013), but presently have not been authenticated for recognition in court.
Notwithstanding the very current outline of such quizzes to criminal casework
in certain countries, forthcoming investigation concerning both marker’s
specificity transversely as an extensive variety of materials, inter- and
intra-individual difference, in vitro steadiness, gender, age and/or ancestry
linked effects, as well as full valuation and validation of the planned
multiplex forensic coordinations, scraps essential to
completely inaugurate concrete practicality in criminal casework (Breitling et al., 2011; Freire-Aradas et al., 2017; Vidaki
& Kayser, 2017) have emphasized
better dissimilarity in acknowledged age versus age foretold with DNA methylation markers for children and ageing people, comparative
to medium-aged people. This may exemplify the inconsistencies between genetic
and consecutive age as noticed with epigenetic markers, which are predictable
to be greater throughout developing generation and with progressive age
associated with medium-aged individuals. Though, most committers of crime are
of intermediate age. Forensically appropriate profitable resolutions are at
present not accessible in spite of the snowballing awareness from police forces
universally. However, we believe that supplementary examination and validation
trainings will categorize robust markers that ultimately will be assembled
laidback in multiplex explanations for age approximation from crime scene
traces (Kovatsi et al., 2015; Sauer et al., 2016).
Identification of Twins
Monozygotic (MZ)
twins cannot be separately recognized through normal forensic DNA analysis
since they stake the identical DNA profile, which is a disadvantage for law
implementation. For a facility founded on ultra-deep complete genome sequencing
to distinguish very occasional somatic mutations (Li et al., 2013; Lindenbergh et al., 2012). Even though some researchers have discovered the worth of epigenetic
summarizing in forensically discerning MZ twins it is not up till now
completely recognized whether the perceived twin-to-twin metamorphoses are twin
pair-specific, or influence be universal and appropriate crosswise twin pairs, as would be favored (Li et al., 2013; Du et al., 2015). In recent times, a first attempt was finished to
validate the likelihood of distinguishing amongst MZ twins consuming forensic epigenetics (Vikadi et al., 2017). DNA methylation
adjustments over time and dissimilar tissues, expertise, and methodologies will
conclude whether variance DNA methylation is
undeniably a appropriate methodology for addressing
this forensic problem (Lee et al.,
2016).
Future Potential of forensic epigenetics
Notwithstanding
tobacco smoking being extensively documented as having deleterious health
consequences, a large amount of the world residents immobile
smokes: for instance, 19–32% of Europeans (Eurostat,
2017). Smoking is recognized to effect DNA impairment and telomere restriction,
and also epigenetic vicissitudes, which are produced by properties on DNA methyltransferase appearance and DNA methylation
decorations (Houseman et al., 2012; Huang et al., 2013).
Forthcoming experimentations are also desirable to regulate whether epigenetic
alterations are predicted only in the brain, or whether these are also
measureable in forensically more pertinent tissues, such as blood. Finally,
drug dose-dependent and rescindable paraphernalia are also projected (Vikadi et al.,
2016; Linnér et
al., 2017). We imagine that forthcoming large-scale epigenomic investigation of dissimilar diet groups, such as
fruitarians against non-vegetarians, might permit the building of extrapolation
prototypes that have the prospective to be recycled in forensic applications.
In divergence to hereditary data in forensic DNA sketching, and as with
hereditary data from exterior and lineage extrapolation, epigenetic/epigenomic data from existence likelihood are not deposited
in fundamental forensic databases. Only the mannerism figures, but no concrete
genetic/epigenetic data, would be interconnected to the police for usage in
examinations. Ethical and communal questions of probabilistic epigenomic standard of living likelihood ought
be conferred between interdisciplinary assemblages of connoisseurs, comprising
councils with epigenetics, law experts, social,
ethics and forensic, formerly applied presentations can be deliberated.
Conclusion
Forensic
science has revolutionized the criminal investigation and set it on scientific
routes. By this, true implication of law has been assured without wrongful
arrests, error free investigation and transparent judgment. Forensic epigenetics is modern fields with a lot aspects related to
crime scene and criminal investigations by providing answers to every primary
and basic levels of questions. Also it has provided
solution to problems which were not possible with traditional DNA based
techniques e.g. discriminations of monozygotic twins. This field has many
prolific prospects for criminal investigation. It not only itself useful in
sorting out many criminal investigations but also aids in use methods and
techniques of forensic science. The future also is quite promising as far as
solution to such investigation related problems is concerned.
Conflict of interest
The
authors declared absence of conflict of interest.
References
Anway, M. D., Cupp, A. S., Uzumcu, M., &
Skinner, M. K. (2005). Epigenetic transgenerational
actions of endocrine disruptors and male fertility. science, 308(5727), 1466-1469.
Bird, A. (2007). Perceptions of epigenetics. Nature, 447(7143),
396.
Breitling, L. P., Yang, R., Korn, B., Burwinkel, B., &
Brenner, H. (2011).
Tobacco-smoking-related differential DNA methylation:
27K discovery and replication. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 88(4),
450-457.
Chong, S., &
Whitelaw, E. (2004). Epigenetic germline
inheritance. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development, 14(6),
692-696.
Du, Q., Zhu, G., Fu, G., Zhang, X.,
Fu, L., Li, S., & Cong, B. (2015). A genome-wide scan of
DNA methylation markers for distinguishing
monozygotic twins. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 18(6),
670-679.
Eckhardt, F., Lewin,
J., Cortese, R., Rakyan, V.
K., Attwood, J., Burger, M., ... & Beck, S.
(2006). DNA methylation profiling
of human chromosomes 6, 20 and 22. Nature
genetics, 38(12), 1378-1385.
EDU, (2015).
Crime Scene Investigator, Archived from
the original on 6 September 2015.
Eurostat (2017). Tobacco consumption
statistics. explained/index.php/Tobacco_consumption_statistics.http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics.
Fraga, M. F., Ballestar,
E., Paz, M. F., Ropero, S., Setien,
F., Ballestar, M. L., ...
& Esteller, M. (2005). Epigenetic differences
arise during the lifetime of monozygotic twins. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences, 102(30), 10604-10609.
Freire-Aradas, A., Phillips, C., & Lareu, M. V. (2017). Forensic individual age estimation
with DNA: from initial approaches to methylation
tests. Forensic Science Review, 29(2).
Frumkin, D., Wasserstrom, A., Budowle, B.,
& Davidson, A. (2011). DNA methylation-based
forensic tissue identification. Forensic Science International:
Genetics, 5(5), 517-524.
Heyn, H., Moran, S., Hernando-Herraez, I., Sayols, S., Gomez,
A., Sandoval, J., & Esteller, M. (2013). DNA methylation contributes to natural human variation. Genome
research, 23(9), 1363-1372.
Holtkötter, H., Beyer, V., Schwender,
K., Glaub, A., Johann, K. S., Schürenkamp,
M., ... & EUROFORGEN-NoE
Consortium. (2017). Independent validation of body
fluid-specific CpG markers and construction of a
robust multiplex assay. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 29,
261-268.
Hong, E. J., West,
A. E., & Greenberg, M. E. (2005). Transcriptional control of cognitive
development. Current opinion in neurobiology, 15(1),
21-28.
Horvath, S. (2013). DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome
Biology, 14(10), 1-20.
Houseman, E. A., Accomando,
W. P., Koestler, D. C., Christensen, B. C., Marsit,
C. J., Nelson, H. H., ... & Kelsey, K. T. (2012). DNA methylation
arrays as surrogate measures of cell mixture distribution. BMC
Bioinformatics, 13(1), 1-16.
Huang, J., Okuka, M., Lu, W., Tsibris, J.
C., McLean, M. P., Keefe, D. L., & Liu, L. (2013). Telomere shortening and DNA damage
of embryonic stem cells induced by cigarette smoke. Reproductive
Toxicology, 35, 89-95.
Jeggo, P. A., &
Holliday, R. (1986). Azacytidine-induced reactivation of a DNA repair gene in Chinese hamster ovary
cells. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 6(8),
2944-2949.
Jobling, M. A., &
Gill, P. (2004).
Encoded evidence: DNA in forensic analysis. Nature Reviews Genetics, 5(10),
739-751.
Kader, F.
and Ghai, M. (2015). DNA methylation and application in forensic sciences.
Forensic Sci. Int. 249:pp.255-265.
Kaminsky, Z., & Petronis,
A. (2009). Methylation SNaPshot:
a method for the quantification of site-specific DNA methylation
levels. In DNA Methylation (pp.
241-255). Humana Press.
Kayser, M. (2015). Forensic DNA phenotyping:
predicting human appearance from crime scene material for investigative purposes. Forensic
Science International: Genetics, 18, 33-48.
Kayser, M., & De Knijff, P. (2011). Improving human forensics through
advances in genetics, genomics and molecular biology. Nature
Reviews Genetics, 12(3), 179-192.
Klose, R. J., &
Bird, A. P. (2006).
Genomic DNA methylation: the mark and its
mediators. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 31(2),
89-97.
Kovatsi, L., Vidaki, A., & Fragou, D.
(2015). Syndercombe
Court D. Epigenetic fingerprint. Personalised epigenetics. 1st ed. USA: Elsevier,
221-43.
Kunkel, T. A. (2004). DNA
replication fidelity. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 279:16895–16898.
Laird, C. D., Pleasant, N. D., Clark,
A. D., Sneeden, J. L., Hassan, K. A., Manley, N. C.,
... & Stöger, R. (2004). Hairpin-bisulfite PCR: assessing epigenetic methylation
patterns on complementary strands of individual DNA molecules. Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(1), 204-209.
Lee, H. Y., Lee, S.
D., & Shin, K. J. (2016). Forensic DNA methylation
profiling from evidence material for investigative leads. BMB Reports, 49(7), 359.
Li, C., Zhao, S.,
Zhang, N., Zhang, S., & Hou, Y. (2013). Differences of DNA
methylation profiles between monozygotic twins’ blood
samples. Molecular Biology Reports, 40(9),
5275-5280.
Lindenbergh, A., de Pagter, M., Ramdayal, G., Visser, M., Zubakov, D., Kayser, M., & Sijen, T.
(2012). A multiplex (m) RNA-profiling system for the forensic
identification of body fluids and contact traces. Forensic
Science International: Genetics, 6(5), 565-577.
Linnér, R. K., Marioni,
R. E., Rietveld, C. A., Simpkin,
A. J., Davies, N. M., Watanabe, K., ... & Benjamin, D. J. (2017). An epigenome-wide association study meta-analysis of
educational attainment. Molecular Psychiatry, 22(12),
1680-1690.
Madi, T., Balamurugan, K., Bombardi, R.,
Duncan, G., & McCord, B. (2012). The determination of tissue‐specific DNA methylation
patterns in forensic biofluids using bisulfite modification and pyrosequencing. Electrophoresis, 33(12),
1736-1745.
Naito, E., Dewa,
K., Yamanouchi, H., Takagi, S., & Kominami, R.
(1993). Sex determination using the hypomethylation
of a human macro-satellite DXZ4 in female cells. Nucleic
acids research, 21(10), 2533.
Olkhov‐Mitsel, E., & Bapat, B. (2012). Strategies for discovery and validation of methylated and hydroxymethylated
DNA biomarkers. Cancer medicine, 1(2), 237-260.
Phillips, C. (2015). Forensic genetic analysis of bio-geographical ancestry. Forensic
Science International: Genetics, 18, 49-65.
Riggs, A. D., Suzuki, H., &
Bourgeois, S. (1970). lac
repressor-operator interaction: I. Equilibrium studies. Journal of
Molecular Biology, 48(1), 67-83.
Rogakou, E. P., Boon, C.,
Redon, C., & Bonner, W. M. (1999). Megabase chromatin domains
involved in DNA double-strand breaks in vivo. Journal of Cell Biology, 146(5),
905-916.
Russo, V. E., Martienssen, R. A., & Riggs, A. D. (1996). Epigenetic
mechanisms of gene regulation. Cold Spring Harbor
Laboratory Press.
Satta, R., Maloku, E., Zhubi, A., Pibiri, F., Hajos, M., Costa, E.,
& Guidotti, A. (2008). Nicotine decreases DNA methyltransferase 1 expression and glutamic acid decarboxylase
67 promoter methylation in GABAergic
interneurons. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences, 105(42), 16356-16361.
Sauer, E., Reinke, A. K., & Courts, C. (2016). Differentiation of
five body fluids from forensic samples by expression analysis of four microRNAs using quantitative PCR. Forensic
Science International: Genetics, 22, 89-99.
Sijen, T. (2015). Molecular approaches for forensic
cell type identification: on mRNA, miRNA, DNA methylation and microbial markers. Forensic Science
International: Genetics, 18, 21-32.
Silva, A. J., Ward, K., & White,
R. (1993). Mosaic methylation in clonal tissue. Developmental
Biology, 156(2), 391-398.
Song, F., Mahmood, S., Ghosh, S., Liang,
P., Smiraglia, D. J., Nagase, H., & Held, W. A.
(2009). Tissue
specific differentially methylated regions (TDMR):
Changes in DNA methylation during development. Genomics, 93(2),
130-139.
Van Dongen,
J., Nivard, M. G., Willemsen,
G., Hottenga, J. J., Helmer,
Q., Dolan, C. V., ... & Boomsma,
D. I. (2016). Genetic and environmental influences interact with age and sex in
shaping the human methylome. Nature
Communications, 7(1), 1-13.
Varley, K. E., Gertz,
J., Bowling, K. M., Parker, S. L., Reddy, T. E., Pauli-Behn,
F., ... & Myers, R. M. (2013). Dynamic DNA methylation across diverse human cell lines and tissues. Genome
Research, 23(3), 555-567.
Vidaki, A., & Kayser, M. (2017). From forensic epigenetics
to forensic epigenomics: broadening DNA investigative
intelligence. Genome biology, 18(1), 1-13.
Vidaki, A., & Kayser, M. (2018). Recent progress, methods and
perspectives in forensic epigenetics. Forensic
Science International: Genetics, 37, 180-195.
Vidaki, A., Daniel, B.,
& Court, D. S. (2013). Forensic DNA methylation
profiling—potential opportunities and challenges. Forensic
Science International: Genetics, 7(5), 499-507.
Vidaki, A., Giangasparo, F., & Syndercombe
Court, D. (2016).
Discovery of potential DNA methylation
markers for forensic tissue identification using bisulphite
pyrosequencing. Electrophoresis, 37(21),
2767-2779.
Vidaki, A., López, C. D., Carnero-Montoro,
E., Ralf, A., Ward, K., Spector, T., & Kayser, M. (2017). Epigenetic discrimination of
identical twins from blood under the forensic scenario. Forensic
Science International: Genetics, 31, 67-80.
Waddington, C.H. (1957). (Allen
& Unwin, London, 1957). The Strategy of the Genes.
George Allen & Unwin, Ltd.
Weaver, I. C., Cervoni,
N., Champagne, F. A., D'Alessio, A. C., Sharma, S., Seckl, J. R., ... & Meaney, M. J. (2004). Epigenetic
programming by maternal behavior. Nature Neuroscience, 7(8),
847-854.
Weber-Lehmann, J.,
Schilling, E., Gradl, G., Richter, D. C., Wiehler, J., & Rolf, B. (2014). Finding the needle
in the haystack: differentiating “identical” twins in paternity testing and
forensics by ultra-deep next generation sequencing. Forensic
Science International: Genetics, 9, 42-46.
Wong, A. H., Gottesman, I. I., & Petronis,
A. (2005).
Phenotypic differences in genetically identical organisms: the epigenetic
perspective. Human Molecular Genetics, 14(suppl_1),
R11-R18.
Wong, A. H., Gottesman, I. I., & Petronis,
A. (2005).
Phenotypic differences in genetically identical organisms: the epigenetic
perspective. Human molecular genetics, 14(suppl_1),
R11-R18.
Yet, I., Tsai, P.
C., Castillo-Fernandez, J. E., Carnero-Montoro, E.,
& Bell, J. T. (2016). Genetic and environmental impacts on DNA methylation levels in twins. Epigenomics, 8(1), 105-117.
Zbieć-Piekarska, R., Spólnicka,
M., Kupiec, T., Parys-Proszek,
A., Makowska, Ż., Pałeczka,
A., ... & Branicki, W.
(2015). Development of a forensically useful age prediction method based on DNA
methylation analysis. Forensic Science
International: Genetics, 17, 173-179.
Zhang, B., Zhou, Y., Lin, N., Lowdon, R. F., Hong, C., Nagarajan,
R. P., ... & Wang, T. (2013). Functional DNA methylation differences between tissues, cell types, and
across individuals discovered using the M&M algorithm. Genome
Research, 23(9), 1522-1540.
Zilbauer, M., Rayner,
T. F., Clark, C., Coffey, A. J., Joyce, C. J., Palta,
P., ... & Smith, K. G. (2013). Genome-wide
methylation analyses of primary human leukocyte
subsets identifies functionally important cell-type–specific hypomethylated regions. Blood, 122(25),
e52-e60.
Zolotarenko, A. D., Chekalin, E. V., & Bruskin,
S. A. (2019). Modern Molecular Genetic Methods for Age Estimation in Forensics. Russian
Journal of Genetics, 55(12), 1460-1471.