Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal
ISSN: 2708-2261
www.bcsrj.com
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47264/bcsrj0101026
Biol. Clin. Sci. Res. J.,
Volume, 2020: e026
Original Research
GENETIC ASSOCIATION AMONG SEEDLING TRAITS OF ZEA MAYS UNDER MULTIPLE STRESSES OF
SALTS, HEAVY METALS AND DROUGHT
MUQADAS S, *ALI Q, MALIK A
Institute
of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology), University of the Lahore, Lahore,
Pakistan
Corresponding
author email: saim1692@gmail.com
Abstract
Maize is
an important cereal crop which has been used by human from last thousands of
years as grain crop. It is highly sensitive for drought, heat, cold, salinity
and heavy metals toxicity. The grain yield and quality of grains is highly
affected due to abiotic environmental factors. For
evaluating maize under drought as well as salts and heavy metals we have
conducted an experiment in the greenhouse of IMBB (Institute of Molecular
Biology and Biotechnology), University of the Lahore. Four maize genotypes were
selected for our research work, viz., B-316, EV-1097Q, Raka-poshi
and Sahiwal-2002. The seeds of selected maize genotypes were sown in 72 pots.
Each of the pot was in triplicate for each of the maize genotype. The
treatments of drought, salt and heavy metals were kept as following: Control,
50% irrigation water, 0.5m Molar NaCl, 0.5m Molar
ZnSO4, 0.5m Molar AlCl3 and 0.5m Molar MgCl2. It has been
revealed from results the performance of maize genotypes was variable under
different treatments of heavy metals, drought and salt stress environments. The
treatments of AlCl3 and NaCl were found as
the higher toxic treatments for most of the study traits of maize which may
decrease the photosynthetic rate and accumulations of organic compounds in
maize seedlings and may cause the death of seedlings. Significant and positive correlation
was reported between shoot length other studied traits
while the higher contribution for shoot length was reported for root length, leaf
area and fresh root/shoot weight ratio. It was found from results that the Sahiwal -2002 performed
better under all stress treatments for seedling traits as compared with B-316, Raka-poshi and EV-1097Q maize genotypes.
Keywords: Zea mays, salt, heavy
metals, root length, shoot length, correlation, regression
Introduction
The Maize (Zea mays L.) as one of an important leading
cash and food crops in the world occupied a significant role and position among
all of the cultivated crop cultivars of cereal plants (Dixon et al.,
2009). The
cultivation or growing of maize is a symbolic of the green revolution which has
played an important and pivotal role for fulfillment of nation food and
nutrient requirements. Zea mays is an
important member of family poaceae which is 95% cross
pollinated plant (de Azevedo
Neto et al., 2006; Fisher and
Byerlee, 1990). It ranks at first among all of
the worldwide food crop plants; in terms for its cultivated crop area which is
1097 m ha along with production of grain is 3.13 m tones however it has
productivity potential up to 3264 kg ha-1 (Anonymous,
2018). It has ability
to be grown as below as sea level up to 4000 m of altitude along with the areas
where the rainfall is in the 250-300 mm range. It contributes higher calories
up to 20% and also has higher protein contents as compared with other world's
foods or diets even from all other food crop plants and species. The grain
availability for maize is increasing from 79 g capita-1day-1 up to as higher as
185 g capita-1day-1 however under the increasing population affects since 1960 (Ali et al.,
2014a; Sheng et al.,
2008). The maize is
the 3rd most an important among cereal crops after rice and maize and was the
key crop in green revolution. In Pakistan maize was grown on an area up to 1097
m ha along with grain production up to 3.13 million tones
while the average grain productivity was 3.07 t ha-1 (Anonymous,
2018). The grain
yield of maize has been highly affected due to abiotic
environmental factors which included drought, salt, alkalinity, heat and cold
stress. The world water demands and supply has been affected due to changing
climate conditions (Karahara et
al., 2004; Rohanipoor et
al., 2013). The drought stress caused
damage of cell membranes which lead towards the abnormality of cell growth and
development in crop plants. The deficiencies of the nutrients in the soil also
caused the decrease in the growth of maize. The long drought and heat stress
conditions for maize growth in tropical and subtropical regions of the world
have been highly affected which may lead towards the famine in those maize
growing area of world (Ali et al.,
2015; Ali et al.,
2016; Nadeem et
al., 2006). Therefore, it
is the need of hour to take another serious initiative to increase the plant
productivity for major cash crops even with lower input to keep the
sustainability of crop grain yield and production in maize. The crop
productivity of maize is controlled through large number of factors among which
mineral salt nutrition especially the nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium
(K) are the most important nutrients (Shan et al.,
2014; Shu and Liu,
2001). The abiotic environmental stress conditions caused damages on
maize which highly affect to reduce grain yield and crop productivity of maize.
The drought, heavy metals and salt stresses caused the damages in cell
membrane, the production of organic toxic chemicals with the accumulation of
highly reactive oxygen species (ROS) within the maize plant body parts (Aaliya et
al., 2016; Rohanipoor et
al., 2013; Zubair et
al., 2016). Drought and
salt stresses caused un-repairable damages in plant cell membranes, whoever the
use of plant growth regulators may be helpful to keep plants healthy and
withstand under any type of stress environmental conditions (de Azevedo
Neto et al., 2006; Hütsch et
al., 2014; Karahara et
al., 2004).
Materials and methods
Maize
is an important cereal crop which has been used by human from last thousands of
years as grain crop. Maize is highly sensitive for drought, heat, cold,
salinity and heavy metals toxicity. The grain yield and quality of grains is
highly affected due to abiotic environmental factors.
For evaluating maize for drought as well as salts and heavy metals we have
conducted an experiment in the greenhouse of IMBB (Institute of Molecular
Biology and Biotechnology), University of the Lahore. Four maize genotypes were
selected for our research work, viz.,
Raka-poshi, B-316, EV-1097Q and Sahiwal-2002. The
seeds of selected maize genotypes were sown in 72 pots. Each of the pot was in
triplicate for each of the maize genotype. The treatments of drought, salt and
heavy metals were kept as following: T0 (Control), T1 (50%
irrigation water), T2 (0.5mMolar NaCl, T3
(0.5mMolar ZnSO4), T4 (0.5mMolar AlCl3) and T5
(0.5mMolar MgCl2). The seeds
were sown and after germination, the seedlings were given stress treatments
after one week of germination. The drought treatment was carried out through
the application of 200ml water to normal or control plants while 100ml to the
plants under drought stress. The treatment of NaCl,
ZnSO4, AlCl3 and MgCl2 was applied through the
irrigation of pots through adding 15ml to each pot. The seedling data was
recorded for diverse morphological traits, as given below: leaf area, root/shoot
dry weight ratio, roots per plant, root length, shoot length and root/shoot
fresh weight ratio and statistical analysis was carried out through using SPSS
23.1 version.
Results and
discussions
The results from table 1 revealed that
there were significant differences among the maize genotypes under all applied
treatments. The performance of all genotypes under control conditions was 100%
in sense of survival under heavy metals and salt stress conditions. It was found results that the maize genotype
Sahiwal-2002 showed higher performance under affects of all treatments as
compared with other maize genotypes. The results from table 2 indicated that
there was lower coefficient of variation for all studied traits which showed
consistency of results, the average leaf area of maize genotypes under combined
effects of all treatments was 6.342±0.0011cm2, root per plant or
seedling 6.945±0.0023, dry root/shoot weight ratio 0.7203±0.0011, fresh
root/shoot weight ratio 0.9261±0.0002, root length 23.013±1.0003cm and shoot
length 21.602±1.0264cm. The higher root and shoot lengths indicated that the
seedlings showed tolerance for all applied treatments of salts and heavy
metals. The selection of maize genotypes may be helpful to improve stress
tolerance and enhance grain yield under stressful environmental conditions (Ali et al.,
2011; Ashraf et
al., 2020; Khalil et
al., 2020).
Table
1. Survival percentage of maize genotypes under different multi stress
conditions
Treatments |
B-316 |
Raka-poshi |
EV-1097Q |
Sahiwal-2002 |
Control |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
50% irrigation water (T1) |
76.24 |
75.34 |
71.12 |
77.54 |
0.5Molar NaCl (T2) |
77.45 |
72.14 |
73.82 |
78.59 |
0.5Molar ZnSO4 (T3) |
82.45 |
78.25 |
76.34 |
80.23 |
0.5Molar AlCl3 (T4) |
81.34 |
80.21 |
72.24 |
82.13 |
0.5Molar MgCl2 (T5) |
80.47 |
78.23 |
77.05 |
81.29 |
Table 2. Genetic components for morphological traits of
maize seedlings
Source |
LA |
RPP |
DRSWR |
FRSWR |
RL |
SL |
Replication |
0.0001 |
0.0021 |
0.0002 |
0.0001 |
0.0065 |
0.0024 |
Genotypes |
8..028* |
2.0247* |
0.00632* |
0.0047* |
59.2425* |
43.261* |
Treatments |
7.947* |
3.4148* |
0.01213* |
0.0161* |
9.2621* |
8.1023* |
Genotypes × treatments |
19.302* |
2.6024* |
0.00418* |
0.00133* |
3.0231* |
2.7425* |
Error |
0.0024 |
0.0032 |
0.00021 |
0.0002 |
0.0007 |
0.0302 |
Grand Mean |
6.342 |
6.945 |
0.7203 |
0.9261 |
23.013 |
21.602 |
Coefficient of variance (%) |
9.402 |
7.103 |
7.120 |
9.022 |
11.026 |
9.422 |
Standard Error |
0.0011 |
0.0023 |
0.0011 |
0.0002 |
1.0003 |
1.0264 |
Genetic advance |
23.024 |
17.189 |
13.142 |
21.821 |
23.232 |
23.032 |
Broad sense heritability |
85.190 |
84.244 |
81.325 |
86.102 |
92.220 |
94.508 |
* = Significant at 5% probability level, DRSWR = dry
root/shoot weight ratio, FRSWR = fresh root/shoot weight ratio, RL= root
length, SL = shoot length, RPP = roots per plant, LA = leaf area
The
figure 1 showed that the genotype EV-1097Q and Sahiwal-2002 showed better
performance for leaf area as compared with B-316 and Raka-poshi
under all different treatments of salts and heavy metals. The maize genotypes
showed almost nearly similar number of root per seedling under all types of
treatments (Figure 2). The root and shoot length of genotype EV-1097Q and
Sahiwal-2002 was found higher as compared with B-316 and Raka-poshi
under all different treatments of salts and heavy metals (Figures 3, 4). The
higher fresh root/shoot weight ratio was found for B-316, and higher dry
root/shoot weight ratio was found higher for Sahiwal-2002 as compared with
other genotypes under all of the applied treatments (Figures 5, 6 respectively).
The higher root length, shoot length, fresh root/shoot weight ratio and dry
root/shoot weight ratio indicated that the genotypes showed tolerance for salt
and heavy metal stress conditions. The selection of maize genotypes for these
traits may be useful for improving stress tolerance in maize genotypes to
improve grain yield and production under varying environmental conditions (Masood et
al., 2015; Mazhar et
al., 2020; Saif-ul-malook
et al., 2014).
Figure
1. Comparison of
maize genotypes for leaf area under different treatments
Figure
2. Comparison of
maize genotypes for number of roots under different treatments
Figure
3. Comparison of
maize genotypes for shoot length under different treatments
Figure 4.
Comparison of maize genotypes for root length under different treatments
Figure
5. Comparison of
maize genotypes for fresh root/shoot weight ratio under different treatments
Figure 6. Comparison of maize genotypes for dry root/shoot weight ratio under
different treatment
The
results from table 3 indicated correlation among studied traits, there was significant
and positive correlation among root length, shoot length, dry root/shoot weight
ratio, fresh root/shoot weight, roots per plant and
leaf area. The significant correlation between rot and shoot length indicated
that the selection on the basis of these traits may be helpful to induce stress
tolerance in maize genotypes. From regression analysis it was found that root
length was higher contributor towards shoot length was reported as 7.6031
followed by leaf area (4.4012), fresh root/shoot weight ratio (4.3022) while
negative contribution was found for root per plant (-1.0172) and dry root/shoot
weight ratio (-3.020). The higher and positive contribution of root length and
leaf area indicated that there was higher photosynthetic rate under stress
conditions and absorption of inorganic mineral salts and water from soil which
leads to improve plant growth and development (Abbas et al.,
2016; Ali et al.,
2017; Ali et al.,
2014b; Boomsma et
al., 2009; Saif-ul-malook
et al., 2014; Tahir et al.,
2020). The predicted
regression equation was Y = 1.217 + 7.6031(RL) + 4.4012(LA) – 3.020(DRSWR)
+4.3022(FRSWR) – 1.0172(RPP)
Table
3. Correlation
among morphological traits of maize
Traits |
LA |
RPP |
DRSWR |
FRSWR |
RL |
RPP |
0.4234* |
||||
DRSWR |
-0.0092 |
0.1294 |
|||
FRSWR |
0.1923 |
0.2120 |
0.5012* |
||
RL |
0.5674* |
0.2925* |
-0.6624* |
-0.1002 |
|
SL |
0.8421* |
0.6304* |
0.8724* |
0.9101* |
0.7972* |
* = Significant at 5% probability level, DRSWR = dry
root/shoot weight ratio, FRSWR = fresh root/shoot weight ratio, RL= root
length, SL = shoot length, RPP = roots per plant, LA = leaf area
Table
4. Regression
analysis for shoot length among morphological traits of maize
Traits |
Coefficients |
Standard
Error |
t Stat |
Partial R2 |
Lower 95% |
Upper 95% |
RL |
7.6031 |
0.001 |
-0.0132 |
0.6712 |
0.0313 |
0.0412 |
LA |
4.4012 |
0.1202 |
0.0028 |
0.4602 |
0.0012 |
0.2901 |
DRSWR |
-3.020 |
0.0029 |
-1.0018 |
0.1502 |
-0.0342 |
0.4205 |
FRSWR |
4.3022 |
0.0167 |
4.0128 |
0.0421 |
-1.1082 |
1.3202 |
RPP |
-1.0172 |
0.0108 |
0.2012 |
0.0322 |
-0.0245 |
0.0116 |
Y = 1.217, Multiple R2= 0.8534, R2 =
0.6823, Adjusted R2 = 0.6424, Standard Error = 0.0231 DRSWR = dry
root/shoot weight ratio, FRSWR = fresh root/shoot weight ratio, RL= root
length, SL = shoot length, RPP = roots per plant, LA = leaf area
Conflict of
interest
The
authors have declared absence of any type of conflict of interest.
References