Biological and Clinical Sciences Research
Journal
Biol. Clin. Sci.
Res. J. Volume, 2020: e021
GENETIC ASSOCIATION
AMONG MORPHOLOGICAL TRAITS OF ZEA MAYS SEEDLINGS UNDER SALT STRESS
NAWAZ A, HASEEB A, MALIK HA, *ALI Q,
MALIK A
Institute of
Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, The University of
Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan
Corresponding
author: saim1692@gmail.com
Abstract
Zea mays is an important cereal
crop which has been used by human from last thousands of years as grain crop.
It is very sensitive for drought, heat, cold, salinity and heavy metals
toxicity. For evaluating corn for salt stress we have conducted an experiment
in the greenhouse of IMBB, University of the Lahore. Four maize genotypes were selected
for our research work, viz., B-316, EV-1097Q, Raka-poshi and
Sahiwal-2002 under the treatments of salt were kept as following: control,
0.2Molar NaCl, 0.5Molar NaCl,
0.7Molar NaCl and 1Molar NaCl.
The selection of genotypes for high shoot and root
length under treatments 0.5Molar
NaCl, 0.7Molar NaCl may be fruitful for the improvement of crop production and productivity.
It was found from results that the B-316 performed better under all stress
treatments for seedling traits as compared with EV-1097Q and Sahiwal-2020 maize
genotypes. The results showed that higher genetic advance and heritability was
recorded for both root length and shoot length. The significant and positive
correlation was recorded among root length, shoot length, root dry weight and
shoot dry weight. The regression analysis showed that the higher contribution
for shoot length was found for root length. It was concluded from our study
that the selection of maize genotypes may be fruitful on the basis of root
length and shoot length to improve grain yield under salt stress conditions.
Keywords:
Zea mays, salt stress,
genetic advance, regression analysis, root length
Introduction
The maize (Zea mays L.) as one of an important leading
cash and food crops in the world occupied a significant role and position among
all of the cultivated crop cultivars of cereal plants (Boomsma et al., 2009). The cultivation or growing of
maize is a symbolic of the green revolution which has played an important and
pivotal role for fulfillment of nation food and nutrient requirements. It is
one of the most important among all of the worldwide fodder as well as food
crop plants; in terms for its cultivated crop area which is 0.973 m ha along
with production of grain is 3.707 m tones however it has productivity potential
up to 3805 kg ha-1 (Anonymous, 2018). It has ability to be grown as
below as sea level up to 5000 m of altitude along with the areas where the
rainfall is in the 300-1130 mm range. The grain availability for maize is
increasing due to increasing population affects since (Ali et al., 2012; Buckler et al., 2009). The growing area of maize has
been decreasing through every year while very low expectation of increasing
area and production in coming future. Therefore, there is an urgent requirement
or need for vertical or continuous increase for fodder and grain yield/hectare
for insuring the household and livestock food and fee security throughout the
world (Edreira and Otegui, 2012; Mustafa et al., 2013; Mustafa et al., 2018). It has been
noted that the current climatic effects caused a change in the relation for
wheat has become inconclusive along with the model dependent in maize growth,
development, grain productivity and yield (Farooq et al., 2015; Saif-ul-malook et
al., 2014). It has been found form various
research works on climatic changing effects that the increase in temperature
and rainfall are interlinked with each other, the increase in the temperature
is also causing drought along with salt stress in the temperate, tropical and
subtropical regions of the world, there is an average increase in temperature
up to 3-4°C till end of 21th century throughout the world and South
East Asia continent (Gavaghan et al., 2011; Khalil et al., 2020; Mazhar et al., 2020; Zubair et al., 2016). The present
study was carried out to evaluate the effects of salt stress on maize seedling
morphological traits and association among them.
Materials and methods
For
evaluating maize for salt or NaCl stress, we have
conducted an experiment in the greenhouse of Institute of Molecular Biology and
Biotechnology, The University of Lahore, Lahore. Four maize genotypes were
selected for our research work, viz.,
B-316, EV-1097Q, Raka-poshi and Shawil-2002. The
seeds of selected wheat genotypes were sown in 56 pots. Each of the pot was in
triplicate for each of the maize genotype. The treatments of salt were kept as
following: T0 (control no any type of treatment), T1 (0.20Molar NaCl), T2 (0.5Molar NaCl), T3
(0.7Molar NaCl) and T4 (1Molar NaCl).
The seeds were sown and after
germination, the seedlings were given stress treatments after one week of
germination. The salt treatment was carried out through the application of
200ml water to normal or control plants while 100ml to the plants under salt
stress. The seedling data was recorded for diverse morphological traits, viz., leaf area, roots per plant, dry
root weight, root length, shoot length, shoot dry
weight. The recorded data was analyzed statistically through the analysis of
variance (ANOVA) techniques through using the SPSS23.1 software.
Results and discussions
It was found from results that the all
of the maize genotypes showed 100% survival under control conditions while it
was found that by increasing salt concentrations the performance of maize
genotypes for survival under salt stress was decreased. The genotype B-316
showed better survival under all stress conditions. It was also found from
results that du tot increasing salt stress the survival of maize genotypes was
decreased. The results from table 2 showed that there were significant
differences among the treatments, genotypes and the interactions of treatments
and genotypes. It was found that the lower coefficient of variance was recorded
for all of the studied traits which revealed that there was consistency among
the results of all studied traits (Ashraf et al.,
2020; Khalil et al., 2020; Mazhar et al.,
2020). The lower coefficient of variance also indicated
that the results were reliable for the selection of resistance genotypes of
maize against salt effects. The average leaf area under all of the studied
traits was recorded as 5.821±0.0112cm2, while average roots per
plant (7.017±0.0106), dry root weight (0.372±0.0011g), dry shoot weight
(0.3423±0.0012g), root length (19.231±1.2352cm) and shoot length
(8.123±0.0235cm) were recorded. It was indicated from results that the higher
root length and shoot length under effects of salt revealed the plant tolerance
and the chance of selecting maize genotypes against salt stress. The higher
genetic advance was recorded for dry shoot weight (12.383%), root length
(19.231%) and shoot length (27.469%) while higher heritability was recorded for
all of the studied traits especially dry shoot weight (91.242%), root length
(94.235%) and shoot length (96.245%). The higher genetic advance and
heritability revealed that the selection may be fruitful to improve grain yield
and production of maize under salt stress conditions.
Table
1. Survival percentage of maize genotypes under different salt
stress conditions
Treatments |
B-316 |
Raka-poshi |
EV-1097Q |
Sahiwal-2002 |
Control (T0) |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
0.2Molar NaCl (T1) |
93.24 |
88.34 |
93.25 |
92.23 |
0.5Molar NaCl(T2) |
90.57 |
82.24 |
87.26 |
89.34 |
0.7Molar NaCl (T3) |
89.47 |
79.56 |
83.75 |
81.46 |
1Molar NaCl (T5) |
86.34 |
77.43 |
80.24 |
78.65 |
Table 2. Genetic components for morphological traits of
maize seedlings
Source |
LA |
RPP |
DRW |
DSW |
RL |
SL |
Replication |
0.0004 |
0.0267 |
0.0192 |
0.0014 |
0.0041 |
0.0028 |
Genotypes |
6.0246* |
8.1911* |
17.671* |
2.0171* |
9.9432* |
8.2231* |
Treatments |
0.3215 * |
7.2451* |
6.924* |
11.013* |
7.7023* |
14.2280* |
Genotypes Ś treatments |
0.1420 * |
3.123* |
9.0241* |
6.0151* |
11.1026* |
9.4014* |
Error |
0.0022 |
0.0011 |
0.0711 |
0.0018 |
0.0011 |
0.0031 |
Grand Mean |
5.821 |
7.017 |
0.372 |
0.34231 |
19.231 |
9.261 |
Coefficient of variance (%) |
2.37 |
3.232 |
3.56 |
5.432 |
6.213 |
8.123 |
Standard Error |
0.0112 |
0.0106 |
0.0011 |
0.0012 |
1.3241 |
0.0235 |
Genetic advance |
8.541 |
7.252 |
7.391 |
12.383 |
17.2443 |
27.469 |
Broad sense heritability |
89.234 |
87.535 |
90.128 |
91.242 |
94.235 |
96.245 |
* = Significant at 5% probability level, DRW = dry
root weight, FRW = fresh root weight, RL= root length, SL = shoot length, RPP =
roots per plant, LA = leaf area
The
results from table 3 indicated that the higher shoot length of B-316 was found higher
under control and 1Molar NaCl treatment (8.560cm,
8.556cm) respectively, root length (19.360cm) under 1Molar NaCl,
leaf area (5.770cm2), number of roots (6.660), shoot dry weight
(0.290g) and root dry weight (0.281g) under 0.7Molar NaCl
concentration. The higher shoot length (9.710cm) of Raka-poshi
was found along with higher root length (22.140cm) and leaf area (6.950cm2)
under 1Molar NaCl, while, number of roots (6.660) and
shoot dry weight (0.360g) under 0.7Molar NaCl and
root dry weight (0.350g) under 0.2Molar NaCl
concentration. The higher shoot length (8.66cm) of EV-1097Q was found along
with higher root length (22.560cm) and leaf area (7.10cm2) under
0.5Molar NaCl, while, number of roots (7.860) and
shoot dry weight (0.330g) under 0.2Molar NaCl and
root dry weight (0.332g) under 1Molar NaCl
concentration. The higher shoot length (9.622cm) of Sahiwal-2002 was found
along with higher root length (18.464cm) and leaf area (7.453cm2)
under 0.2Molar NaCl, while, number of roots (7.564),
shoot dry weight (0.321g) and root dry weight (0.327g) under 1Molar NaCl concentration. The higher root length under salt
stress conditions indicated that the plants showed tolerance against salt
stress and helped to improve shoot length of maize seedlings under salt stress
conditions (Mazhar et al., 2020; Mupangwa et al.,
2007; Mustafa et al., 2013). The selection
of maize genotypes on the basis of higher root length and shoot length may be
helpful to improve the salt stress tolerance in maize genotypes and selected
genotypes may be used for the development of maize hybrids and synthetic
varieties (Ali et al., 2013; Ali et al., 2016; Masood et al., 2015).
Table 3. Mean comparison for maize genotypes under
different salt concentrations
Genotypes |
Treatments |
SL |
RL |
LA |
NR |
SDW |
RDW |
B-316 |
|||||||
Control (T0) |
8.560a |
18.660b |
4.670b |
6.660a |
0.280b |
0.275b |
|
0.2Molar NaCl (T1) |
7.550b |
18.200c |
4.680b |
6.460b |
0.275c |
0.276b |
|
0.5Molar NaCl(T2) |
8.558a |
18.660b |
4.660b |
6.660a |
0.278c |
0.280a |
|
0.7Molar NaCl (T3) |
8.560a |
19.260a |
5.770a |
6.660a |
0.290a |
0.281a |
|
1Molar NaCl (T5) |
8.559a |
19.360a |
5.750a |
6.560b |
0.290a |
0.269c |
|
Raka-poshi |
|||||||
Control (T0) |
7.679c |
19.540b |
5.920b |
6.610b |
0.350b |
0.329c |
|
0.2Molar NaCl (T1) |
9.710a |
17.040c |
5.850b |
7.710a |
0.360a |
0.350a |
|
0.5Molar NaCl(T2) |
8.706b |
17.140c |
5.840b |
7.710a |
0.358b |
0.348b |
|
0.7Molar NaCl (T3) |
8.709b |
17.140c |
5.860b |
7.610a |
0.360a |
0.349b |
|
1Molar NaCl (T5) |
7.679c |
22.140a |
6.950a |
6.610b |
0.338c |
0.341b |
|
EV-1097Q |
|||||||
Control (T0) |
9.667a |
17.360c |
6.040c |
7.960a |
0.328b |
0.339a |
|
0.2Molar NaCl (T1) |
8.66b |
17.36c |
6.06c |
7.86a |
0.33a |
0.33c |
|
0.5Molar NaCl(T2) |
7.64c |
22.56a |
7.15a |
6.96b |
0.309c |
0.331c |
|
0.7Molar NaCl (T3) |
7.641c |
22.36a |
7.15a |
6.86b |
0.308c |
0.333c |
|
1Molar NaCl (T5) |
8.662b |
18.16b |
6.26b |
6.86b |
0.33a |
0.332b |
|
Sahiwal-2002 |
|||||||
Control (T0) |
7.522d |
17.24c |
6.346b |
7.454a |
0.332a |
0.322c |
|
0.2Molar NaCl (T1) |
9.622a |
18.464a |
7.453a |
7.324b |
0.321b |
0.314d |
|
0.5Molar NaCl(T2) |
9.612b |
16.758d |
6.354b |
6.243c |
0.311b |
0.325b |
|
0.7Molar NaCl (T3) |
7.521d |
18.256b |
6.453b |
7.564a |
0.321b |
0.327a |
|
1Molar NaCl (T5) |
8.532c |
16.885d |
7.543a |
7.345b |
0.301c |
0.311e |
The
results from table 4 revealed that there was a significant correlation between
number of roots and leaf area, dry root weight, and root length. The positive
and significant correlation was found between leaf area and dry root weight,
root length and number of roots per plant. The root length was significantly
and positively correlated with leaf area, shoots length, number of roots per
plant, dry root weight, dry shoot weight while
negatively and significantly correlated with dry shoot weight. The shoot length
was positively and significantly correlated with dry shoot weight and root
length. The significant and positive correlation of root length, shoot length,
dry root weight indicated that the selection of maize genotypes for improving
grain yield and productivity under salt stress conditions may be helpful (Ali et al., 2014; Ali et al., 2011; Saif-ul-malook et al., 2014).
Table
4. Correlation
among morphological traits of white top
Traits |
LA |
RPP |
DRW |
DSW |
RL |
RPP |
0.7654* |
||||
DRW |
0.3776* |
0.6769* |
|||
DSW |
0.0344 |
-0.0834 |
-0.0553 |
||
RL |
0.5867* |
0.7863* |
0.8536* |
-0.3739* |
|
SL |
-0.6556 |
0.0463 |
-0.2038 |
0.7948* |
0.8948* |
* = Significant at 5% probability level, DRW = dry
root weight, FRW = fresh root weight, RL= root length, SL = shoot length, RPP =
roots per plant, LA = leaf area
The
regression analysis was carried out to find out the contribution of different
traits to improve shoot length (Table 5), it was found that the higher
contribution for improving shoot length was recorded for root length (7.544)
followed by dry shoot weight (3.113) and leaf area (1.231) while negative
contribution was reported for dry root weight (-1.130) and number of root per
plant 9-0.003). The positive contribution indicated that the shoot length will
also be increased due to increase in the root length, leaf area and dry shoot
weight. The coefficient of determination was recorded as 68.23% while revealed
that selection of maize genotypes may be helpful to improve grain yield and
production under salt stress conditions however the process of selection may be
delayed for more improvements in traits of maize genotypes (Ali et al., 2016; Buckler et al., 2009; Khalil et al., 2020; Tahir et al., 2020). The regression equation predicted
may be written as Y = 1.217+7.544(RL)=1.231(LA)-1.130(DRW)+3.113(DSW)-0.003(RPP)
Table
5. Regression
analysis for shoot length among morphological traits of white top
Traits |
Coefficients |
Standard
Error |
t Stat |
Partial R2 |
Lower 95% |
Upper 95% |
RL |
7.544 |
0.0023 |
-0.0231 |
0.8643 |
0.0023 |
0.036 |
LA |
1.231 |
0.0112 |
0.2324 |
0.3352 |
-0.0351 |
0.3524 |
DRW |
-1.130 |
0.0212 |
1.3643 |
0.1356 |
-0.0235 |
0.3235 |
DSW |
3.113 |
0.0232 |
-5.5356 |
0.0133 |
1.3156 |
2.3532 |
RPP |
-0.003 |
0.104 |
0.4903 |
0.6235 |
-0.0235 |
0.0546 |
Y = 1.217, Multiple R2= 0.8534, R2 =
0.6823, Adjusted R2 = 0.6424, Standard Error = 0.0231 DRW = dry root
weight, FRW = fresh root weight, RL= root length, RPP = roots per plant, LA =
leaf area
Conclusions
It was concluded from our study that the
B-316 performed better under all stress treatments for seedling
traits as compared with EV-1097Q and Sahiwal-2020 maize genotypes. The
correlation and regression analysis showed that the selection of maize
genotypes for improving grain yield and production under slat stress conditions
on the basis of root length, shoot length and shoot dry weight may be fruitful.
Conflict of
interest
The authors declare absence of any
conflict of interest.
References
Gavaghan, C. L., Li, J.
V., Hadfield, S. T., Hole, S., Nicholson, J. K., Wilson, I. D., Howe, P. W.,
Stanley, P. D., and Holmes, E. (2011). Application of NMR‐based metabolomics to the investigation of salt stress in maize (Zea
mays). Phytochemical Analysis 22, 214-224.