ANTIBACTERIAL, ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITIES AND
ASSOCIATION AMONG PLANT GROWTH RELATED TRAITS OF LEPIDIUM DRABA
*Ali
Q1, Khalil R1, Nadeem M2, Hafeez MM1
and Malik A1
1Institute of
Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, The University of
Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan
1Wheat
Research Institute, Ayub Agriculture Research
Institute Faisalabad, Pakistan
Corresponding author
E-mail: saim1692@gmail.com
Abstract
The
Lepidium draba or
white tope also known as hoary cress belongs to family Brassicaceae,
has been known as one of the perennial herbs which grow normally from seeds and
also produced horizontal long creeping roots. It normally grows as a weed plant
in farm fields. The present study was conducted to find out the antibacterial
and antioxidant activities along with the plant traits of Lepidium draba. The shoot, root and inflorescence
extracts were taken through using ethanol, water and n-hexan
as extraction solvents. It was found from our studies that the plant extracts
were heaving alkaloids, saponins, flavonoids,
coumarins, anthocyans, quinons, steroids, sterols and terpenoids
as potential phenolic compounds. The bacterial
strains including Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumonia and Staphylococcus aureus were cultured to
access the antibacterial activities of plant extracts. The higher antibacterial
activity was reported from n-hexan extract which
indicate that the n-hexan extract may be used for
extracting phytochemicals to be used as potential
antibacterial biomedicines. The water extract showed higher antioxidant
activities as compared with ethanol and n-hexan
extracts which indicated that the use of water extract may be as a useful
antioxidant under stress conditions, may also have anticancer activities. The
lower coefficient of variation was recorded for all of the studied traits which
indicated the consistency of results and reliability of selecting plants from
various locations. There was significant and positive correlation among plant
height with inflorescence weight, leaf area and leaf length, the inflorescence
weight showed positive correlation with plant height, lea length and leaf area.
There was higher contribution of plant height while leaf area contributed lower
and negatively towards fresh plant weight. We have concluded from our study
that the Lepidium draba plant
extract showed antibacterial and antioxidant activities through using ethanol,
water and n-hexan as extraction solvents. The
significant correlation and regression associations indicated that the plants
can tolerate harsh environmental conditions.
Keywords: Lepidium
draba, antibacterial, antioxidant, phenols,
ethanol, n-hexan, plant extract
Introduction
The
Lepidium draba or
white tope also known as hoary cress belongs to family Brassicaceae,
has been known as one of the perennial herbs which grow normally from seeds and
also produced horizontal long creeping roots (Reed,
1970). It is native
to the Western Asia, North America, Eastern Europe, Algeria and rest of Africa.
The combination of white top seeds and leaves have expectorant as well as
purgative effects (Al-Marzoqi
et al., 2015). It can grow on
a various types of soil where the moisture has adequate levels, grows under wider
ranges of the disturbed plant and animal habitats which are including the cultivated
lands, pastures, rangelands, along the roadsides, the waste areas which are
known to be particularly the thrive on irrigated land areas (Miri
et al., 2013; Scurfield, 1962; Vasilakoglou et al.,
2006). In past various
phytochemical based studies for white top plant from all
of growing continental environmental conditions have led to isolation as well
as the characterization for phenols, flavonoid, saponins, sulforaphane and glycosides
(Agarwal
and Verma, 2011; Chyad, 2017; Fursa et al., 1970; Ouissem et al., 2018). The allelopathic (Benakashani
et al., 2017; Miri et al., 2013) and the antibacterial
activities of white top plant extract have been were reported by various researchers
(Rad
et al., 2014; Sharifi-Rad et al.,
2015). However, the
antioxidant activities have never been reported. Our study was aimed to
evaluate presence of phytochemical, antioxidant and antimicrobial
activities of white top plant extracts.
Materials and methods
The
plants were collected from the fields of The University of Lahore, Lahore
Pakistan. The preliminary screening for secondary plant metabolites including alkaloids,
saponins, flavonoids, coumarins, anthocyans, quinons, steroids, sterols and terpenoids
was carried out as through phytochemical analysis methods
(Harborne,
1998; Trease and Evans,
1983). The bacterial
strains including Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumonia and Staphylococcus aureus were cultured to
access the antibacterial activities of plant extracts. The antioxidant
activities were also recorded form plant extracts. Ethanol, distilled water and
n-hexan solvents were used for plant extraction. The
data of morphological traits including dry plant weight (DPW), fresh plant
weight, leaf length, plant height, inflorescence
weight and leaf area were calculated and statistically analyzed for analysis of
variance, correlation and regression for studied traits.
Results
and discussions
It was found
from results shown in table 1 that there was presence of various phytochemical in Lepidium draba plant. The alkaloids, coumarins,
sterols, quinons and terpenoids
were detected from all of three ethanol, water and n-hexan
extracts. The ethanol extract showed the presence of flavonoids,
tannins and leucoanthocyans while water extracts
showed presence of saponins, triterpenoids
and anthocyans, and n-hexan
extract showed the presence of flavonoids and leucoanthocyans. The presence of polyphenols
like alkaloids, tennis, terpenoids and flavonoids indicated that the Lepidium draba plant has phytochemicals
which have antibacterial as well as antioxidant activities, the extracted biochemicals may be used as potential medicines as antibacterial
and anticancer agents (Benakashani
et al., 2017; Chyad, 2017). The
antibacterial activities were also observed from extracts of Lepidium draba plant
(Table 2). The results form table 2 indicated that the ethanol extract showed
higher anti bacterial activities against K.
pneumonia (10.23m) followed by S. aureus (9.8mm) and E.
coli with 9.12mm growth inhibition
zone. The water extract showed higher anti bacterial activities against K. pneumonia (8.73m) followed by S. aureus
(9.13mm) and E. coli with 7.12mm growth inhibition zone while the n-hexan extract showed higher anti bacterial activities
against K. pneumonia (11.2m) followed
by S. aureus
(10.13mm) and E. coli with 9.87mm growth inhibition zone. The results showed that
the higher antibacterial activity was reported from n-hexan
extract which indicate that the n-hexan extract may
be used for extracting phytochemicals to be used as
potential antibacterial biomedicines (Ouissem
et al., 2018; Roughani et al.,
2018; Sharifi-Rad et al.,
2015). The
antioxidant activities of different plant part extracts were also studies as
shown in table 3. It was found from results that the ethanol extract from shoot
(0.897), root (0.435) and inflorescence (0.792) showed antioxidant activities,
the water extract from shoot (1.204), root (1.0.72) and inflorescence (0.984)
showed relative higher antioxidant activities as compared with ethanol extract
while the n-hexan extract from shoot (0.967), root
(0.953) and inflorescence (1.0.48) showed antioxidant activities. The results
showed that the antioxidant activity from shoots, roots and inflorescence parts
of Lepidium draba plant. The water extract showed
higher antioxidant activities as compared with ethanol and n-hexan extracts which indicated that the use of water
extract may be as a useful antioxidant under stress conditions, may also have
anticancer activities (Agarwal
and Verma, 2011; Miri et al., 2013; Rad et al., 2014).
Table 1. Phytochemical composition
of white top plant extract
Phytochemical |
Ethanol extract |
Water extract |
n-hexan
extract |
Alkaloids |
+ |
+ |
+ |
Coumarins |
+ |
+ |
+ |
Saponins |
- |
+ |
+ |
Flavonoids |
+ |
- |
+ |
Tannins
|
+ |
- |
- |
Sterols |
+ |
+ |
+ |
Quinons |
+ |
+ |
+ |
Triterpenoids |
- |
+ |
- |
Anthocyans |
- |
+ |
- |
Leucoanthocyans |
+ |
- |
+ |
Terpenoids |
+ |
+ |
+ |
Table 2. Antibacterial activities of white top plant extract
Bacterial
strain |
Ethanol
extract inhibition zone (mm) |
Water
extract inhibition
zone (mm) |
n-hexan extract inhibition zone (mm) |
Escherichia coli |
9.12 |
7.12 |
9.87 |
Klebsiella pneumonia |
10.23 |
8.73 |
11.2 |
Staphylococcus aureus |
9.8 |
9.13 |
10.13 |
Table 3. Antioxidant activities of white top plant
extract
Plant
part |
Ethanol
extract |
Water
extract |
n-hexan extract |
Shoots |
0.897 |
1.204 |
0.967 |
Roots
|
0.435 |
1.072 |
0.953 |
Inflorescence
|
0.792 |
0.984 |
1.048 |
The results from
table 4 indicated that the data was recorded for dry plant weight, fresh plant
weight, leaf length, plant height, inflorescence weight and leaf area which was
subjected for analysis of variance. The results showed there were significant difference
among plants, area and interaction of plant and area of collection for samples.
The average dry plant weight was recorded as 0.083±0.0002kg, fresh plant weight
(0.333±0.013kg), leaf length (18.956±0.824cm), plant height (963.111±2.245cm),
inflorescence weight (3.3952±0.155g) and leaf area (54.2132±2.4231cm2).
The lower coefficient of variation was recorded for all of the studied traits
which indicated the consistency of results and reliability of selecting plants
from various locations (Ali
et al., 2013; Ali et al., 2016; Ali et al., 2014; Usman et al., 2012). The higher
plant height and inflorescence weight indicated that the plants showed
potential resistance against harsh and changing environmental conditions. The
results from table 5 that the higher plant height was recorded for plant 1
(73.00cm) while higher plant height was recorded under the area 1 (91.00cm) as
compared with plant 2 and 3 relatively with area of collections 2 and 3
respectively. The higher inflorescence weight was recorded for plant 3 (4.04g)
while inflorescence weight was recorded under the area 3 (3.20g) as compared
with plant 2 and 1 relatively with area of collections 2 and 1 respectively. The
higher inflorescence weight indicated that the plant have ability to withstand
under harsh environmental conditions. The higher leaf length was recorded for
plant 1 (19.00cm) while higher leaf length was recorded under the area 3 (20.00cm)
as compared with plant 2 and 3 relatively with area of collections 2 and 1
respectively. The higher dry plant weight was recorded for plant 1 (0.07kg)
while higher dry plant weight was recorded under the area 1 (0.11kg) as
compared with plant 2 and 3 relatively with area of collections 2 and 3
respectively. The higher leaf area was recorded for plant 1 (57.00cm2)
while higher leaf area was recorded under the area 3 (60.00cm2) as
compared with plant 2 and 3 relatively with area of collections 2 and 1
respectively while the higher fresh plant weight was recorded for plant 3
(0.400kg) and higher fresh plant weight was recorded under the area 1 (0.38kg)
as compared with plant 2 and 3 relatively with area of collections 2 and 1
respectively. The higher plant fresh and dry weights indicated that the plant
have higher water stress tolerance and higher photosynthetic rate to increase
plant growth and productivity which may lead towards the increasing survival of
Lepidium draba plant
even under harsh conditions (Mahmood
et al., 2015; Mobeen et al., 2015; Sadia et al., 2015).
Table 4. Analysis of variance for morphological traits of
white top
Source |
Df |
DPW |
FPW |
LL |
PH |
IW |
LA |
Replication |
2 |
0.0007 |
0.0001 |
0.5125 |
0.54 |
0.0391 |
0.0002 |
Plants |
2 |
0.0034* |
0.0071* |
12.3258* |
2935.71* |
2.4167* |
6.3421* |
Area |
2 |
0.0015 * |
0.0128* |
73.4394* |
1501.97* |
4.0073* |
7.3230* |
Plants×Area |
4 |
0.0050 * |
0.0565* |
44.4841* |
632.61* |
0.1716* |
13.2344* |
Error |
16 |
0.0002 |
0.0001 |
0.7721 |
0.78 |
0.1313 |
0.0234 |
Grand Mean |
|
0.083 |
0.333 |
18.956 |
63.111 |
3.3952 |
54.2132 |
Coefficient of variance (%) |
|
14.11 |
3.16 |
4.64 |
1.40 |
10.67 |
6.342 |
Standard Error |
|
0.0002 |
0.013 |
0.824 |
2.245 |
0.155 |
2.4231 |
*
= Significant at 5% probability level, DPW = dry plant weight, FPW = fresh
plant weight, LL= leaf length, PH = plant height, IW = inflorescence weight, LA
= leaf area
Table
5. Mean
comparisons of studied traits of white top
Plant |
PH |
IW |
LL |
DPW |
LA |
FPW |
1 |
73.00a |
3.87b |
19.00a |
0.05b |
57a |
0.39b |
2 |
71.50c |
3.90b |
17.50c |
0.07a |
52.5c |
0.39b |
3 |
72.10b |
4.04a |
18.75b |
0.04c |
56.25b |
0.40a |
Area |
||||||
1 |
91.00a |
3.00b |
18.50c |
0.09c |
55.5c |
0.40a |
2 |
90.05b |
2.90c |
19.04b |
0.10b |
57.12b |
0.39b |
3 |
89.90c |
3.20a |
20.00a |
0.11a |
60a |
0.38c |
DPW = dry plant weight, FPW = fresh plant weight, LL
= leaf length, PH = plant height, IW = inflorescence weight, LA = leaf area
The
correlation and regression analysis were carried out to find out the
relationship among studied traits and contribution of independent variables for
fresh plant weight. It was found from results shown in table 6 that there was
significant and positive correlation among plant height with inflorescence
weight, leaf area and leaf length, the inflorescence weight showed positive
correlation with plant height, lea length and leaf area. The dry and fresh
plant weights showed positive and significant correlations among them. A
negative and significant correlation was reported between leaf area and dry
plant weight. The positive and significant correlations among traits indicated
that the plants will have ability to combat with harsh environmental
conditions. The significant and positive correlation between leaf area,
inflorescence weight and plant height indicated that the photosynthetic rate
may be higher which lead towards the increase in the accumulation of organic
compounds in plant body which became the cause of increase in biomass of plant
under stress conditions hence increase the survival rate of plant species (Ali
et al., 2016; Anwer et al., 2015; Sadia et al., 2015; Zameer et al., 2015).
Table
6. Correlation
among morphological traits of white top
Traits |
PH |
IW |
LL |
DPW |
LA |
IW |
0.6076* |
||||
LL |
0.3357* |
0.4789* |
|||
DPW |
-0.0909 |
-0.0258 |
-0.3739* |
||
LA |
0.3357* |
0.4783* |
0.9876* |
-0.3739* |
|
FPW |
-0.0066 |
0.0965 |
-0.2878 |
0.7948* |
-0.2878 |
* = Significant at 5% probability level, DPW = dry
plant weight, FPW = fresh plant weight, LL= leaf length, PH = plant height, IW
= inflorescence weight, LA = leaf area
Table
7. Regression
analysis for fresh plant weight among morphological traits of white top
Traits |
Coefficients |
Standard
Error |
t Stat |
Partial R2 |
Lower 95% |
Upper 95% |
PH |
6.034 |
0.0008 |
-0.0351 |
0.9723 |
-0.0016 |
0.0016 |
IW |
0.0201 |
0.0228 |
0.8829 |
0.3868 |
-0.0271 |
0.0674 |
LL |
1.5430 |
0.0902 |
1.3619 |
0.1870 |
-0.0642 |
0.3099 |
DPW |
2.1813 |
0.3932 |
5.5477 |
0.0000 |
1.3659 |
2.9967 |
LA |
-0.0006 |
0.0014 |
-0.4504 |
0.6568 |
-0.0036 |
0.0023 |
Y
= 0.1228, Multiple R2= 0.8054, R2 = 0.6487, Adjusted R2
= 0.5394, Standard Error = 0.0654, DPW = dry plant weight, FPW = fresh plant
weight, LL= leaf length, PH = plant height, IW = inflorescence weight, LA =
leaf area
It was revealed from
table 7 that there was higher contribution of plant height (6.034) followed by
dry plant weight (2.1813), leaf length (1.5430), inflorescence weight (0.0201)
while leaf area (-0.0006) contributed negatively towards fresh plant weight. the
coefficient of determination 80.54% was found higher which indicated that the
selection of plant with higher survival rate will be helpful for increasing
plant population and productivity over different locations and time zones (Ali et al., 2016; Mahmood
et al., 2015; Sadia et al., 2015). The regression equation was
predicted as Y = 6.034PH + 0.0201IW + 1.5430LL + 2.1813DPW – 0.0006LA
Conclusions
We
have concluded from our study that the Lepidium draba plant extract showed antibacterial and
antioxidant activities through using ethanol, water and n-hexan
as extraction solvents. The plant extracts may be used as potential medicines.
The significant correlation and regression associations indicated that the
plants can tolerate harsh environmental conditions.
Conflict of interest
The
authors declared absence of any potential conflict of interest for manuscript
publication.
References
Reed, C. F. (1970).
"Selected weeds of the United States," US Department of Agriculture.
Scurfield, G. (1962).
Cardaria Draba (L.) Desv. Journal of
Ecology 50, 489-499.
Trease, G., and Evans,
W. (1983). Textbook of Pharmacognosy. (Balliere. Tindall, London, 57-59.