Original Research
STUDY ON
ZOOPLANKTON DIVERSITY DURING SPRING SEASON IN CHASHMA LAKE, PAKISTAN
*HAYAT S1,3,
NAEEM M2, RAMZAN M3, ZAFARULLAH M3, AHMAD I3,
ALI Q1, MALIK A1
1Institute of
Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, The University of
Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan
2Institute of Pure
and Applied Biology, Bahauddin Zakariya
University, Multan, Pakistan
3Fish
Biodiversity Hatchery Punjab Fisheries Department, Chashma,
Mianwali, Pakistan
Corresponding
author E-mail: skndrhayat93@gmail.com
(Received, 9th
March 2020, Accepted 11th May 2020)
Abstract: The present study was conducted to know
the zooplankton species diversity in Chashma Lake
during spring (March 2016 to May 2016). Various physico-chemical
parameters like Temperature, PH, Salinity, conductivity, Total dissolved solids
(TDS), Turbidity, Dissolved Oxygen, Alkalinity, Chloride and Carbon dioxide
which effect the distribution of zooplankton were also analyzed during this
study. Zooplankton community was dominated by different species of rotifers.
Those rotifers were Asplanchna herricki,
Asplanchna brightwelli, Polyarthra remata, Brachionus angularis, Keratella cochlearis, Keratella tecta and Keratella valga tropica. Among these Keratella valga tropica was most common.
Some species of copepods were recorded such as, Diacyclops
thomasi, Acanthocyclops robustus, Mesocyclops edax, Tropocyclops prasinus mexicanus and Orthocyclops modestus. Among
these Diacyclops thomasi
was most abundant. Among copepods some nauplii and copepodid stages were also observed. Different species of cladocerans such as, Bosmina longirostris, Daphnia pulex, Chydorus sphaericus, Alona bicolor, Alonella exigua and Simocephalus serrulatus were also recorded.
Keywords: Zooplankton, Diversity, Chashma Lake, Copepodes, cladocerans
Introduction
Zooplanktons are
of great importance in fresh and marine aquatic ecosystem. Zooplanktons migrate
in dual way, during day time they come upward to follow the prey and go
downward to hide themselves from predators (Castro and Huber, 2012). Chashma Lake,
with respect to its surface area is the 3rd biggest Lake of
Pakistan. It is situated at GPS N32o26.110 E071o 25.571
and at elevation of 640 feet. Its area under water is 360 Km2, Gross
storage capacity at elevation 649 feet is 0.321 MAF, Water surface area is
88900 acres and main water supply source is mighty River Indus. The River Indus
supports a major bulk of the population living in this part of the world. More
than 80 per cent of Pakistan's agricultural wealth and food production is
derived from the river Indus which has been called the "life line" of
Pakistan (Meadows and Meadows, 1999). Water
is fundamental in the evolution of all living organisms and is one of the basic
compounds without which life in any form is not possible in this world. Aquatic
life requires water as a support system and as a medium in which it moves and
obtains oxygen in dissolved form. Terrestrial life also requires a regular
supply of water to maintain its biological processes. It is the most essential
and abundantly available substance in nature (Templeton, 1984). Zooplanktons
are minute organisms which float in the water surface along with water current.
They occupy an intermediate position in the food web. The importance of
zooplanktons as fish food both for adults and fry has been stressed by
different workers (Geiger, 1983; Fontaine and Revera,
1986). The presence and dominance of zooplankton species play very significant
role in the functioning of fresh water ecosystems. The seasonal changes in
zooplankton species are closely related to the physico-chemical
and biological administration of the aquatic environments. Species of Rotifer
and Cladocerans are suggested as indicators that can
be used to identify different physical and chemical gradients or eutrophic increases in reservoirs (Branco
et al., 2002).
Zooplankton not
only transfer energy from primary producers to higher order consumers like
macro crustaceans, insects and small fish but some species are considered good
indicators of trophic status of water bodies. No proper
work on zooplankton diversity in Chashma Lake has so
far been done. However, some notable work on freshwater zooplankton in Pakistan
was done by (Baqai et al., 1974; Akhter and Ali, 1976; Iqbal and Kazmi, 1990; Mahar et al., 2000; Baloch, et al., 2000; Baloch
and Soomro, 2004; Baloch et al., 2004). The present study primarily aims to document
the seasonal distribution of zooplankton species in Chashma
Lake especially during spring season.
Materials and
Methods
Study site
Chashma lake was the study site of the present study (N32o26.110
E071o 25.571)
Water Sampling
The physical and chemical properties of water enormously
influenced the distribution and fertility of aquatic life (Unanam
and Akpan, 2006). Samples for water quality and zooplankton
study were collected fortnightly from March 2016 to May 2016 two times i.e.
Dawn and Dusk. The sampling was carried out from the surface area at three
different locations at GPS (1) N32026.110, E071025.571, (2) N32026.229,
E071023.664, (3) N32027.141, E071020.919 using GARMIN GPS map 76CSX.
Following
characteristics of water were analyzed in the study to check the quality of
water for planktonic life:
1. Physical
Characteristics: The
physical characteristics included water temperature, salinity, conductivity,
total dissolved solids (TDS) and turbidity.
2. Chemical
Characteristics: The
chemical characteristics included pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), alkalinity,
Chloride and Carbon dioxide.
All the physical
parameters were noted at the spot by dipping the probe of digital meters in
water. Measurements of water temperature were made at each station with a
digital thermometer with stainless steel sensor probe (WT-1). The measurements
were taken directly from the water body by dipping the probe of the thermometer
into the water avoiding direct exposure to sunlight (Welch, 1952) and allowing
it to stay for at least five minutes. This was to allow for accuracy in
measurements. The results were taken and recorded accordingly. PH was measured
using digital pH meter (Ecosense PH100). Probe of
digital meter was dip into the water and wait till the stable display of
reading and value was noted in the performa. Same
process was repeated at each station.
Salinity,
Electric conductivity and total dissolved solid (TDS), were recorded using
portable meter, (Ecosense EC300) by dipping its probe
directly into water at each station and stable display of reading was noted in
the Performa. For turbidity EUTECH turbid meter (TN-100) was used by putting
the aliquot filled with water sample into the turbidity meter chamber and
reading was noted. Dissolved oxygen was recorded using Lutron
DO-5510 digital meter by putting its probe directly in the water. The water
samples for chemical analysis were collected in air tight plastic bottles
having capacity of 1 liter. These samples were then brought into Fish
Biodiversity Hatchery chashma Barrage laboratory for
further analysis. Chemical parameters such as Alkalinity, Chloride, and Carbon
dioxide were analyzed using HACH test kit (model FF-1A) readings of these
parameters were noted in the prescribed performa. The important physical and chemical parameters influencing the
aquatic environment are temperature, pH, salinity, dissolved oxygen and carbon
dioxide and these parameters are the limiting factors for the survival of
aquatic organisms (Lawson, 2011).
Zooplankton
Sampling
Zooplankton
samples were collected with a round silk cloth net of mesh size about 60µm. The
diameter of the net was 10cm held open by a metal frame and attached to with a
250ml bottle attached to the distal end. For qualitative and quantitative
plankton sampling, 100 liters of water were poured into net to concentrate the
sample. The samples were preserved on the spot with 5% formalin and were assembled in one sample. All the
zooplanktons were identified up to species or genera level, using keys and
illustrations given by (Ward and Whipple, 1959; Mizuno, 1964; Mizuno and
Takahashi, 1991; Battish, 1992). The following
taxonomic keys were also used in zooplankton identification: Rotifera (Koste, 1978; Segers, 1993; Segers et al., 1993), Cladoceran (Jeje and Fernando, 1986; Korovchinsky,
1992), Copepoda (Jeje, 1988, Williamson, 1991; Ueda and Reid, 2003).
Quantitative estimate of zooplankton was done under the LCD Digital microscope
(Celestron Model#44340) at 100 x magnifications.
Relative abundance of major zooplankton species were
enumerated by counting the samples of 1ml using Sedgwick-Rafter counting cell
(S52). For quantitative analysis whole samples were analyzed and counted.
During the present study it was observed that rotifers contributed 38.88%, cladocerans 33.33% and copepods 27.77% among the
zooplankton community.
Results and
Discussion
The quality of
natural water is generally governed by various physico-chemical
and biological parameters. The mean values for various parameters during the
study period are presented in Table 1. The variations in temperature of
reservoir water were observed in spring season (March 2016 to May 2016). The temperature
values ranged between 22.9 to 29.90C.
Steady changes in the atmospheric temperature with the change in the seasons
results in the corresponding change in the water temperature. High summer
temperature and bright sunshine accelerate the process of decay of organic
matter resulting into the liberation of large quantities of CO2 and
nutrients. The pH is affected not only by the reaction of carbon dioxide but
also by organic and inorganic solutes present in water. Any change in water pH
is complemented by the change in other physicochemical parameters. PH
maintenance is one of the most important characteristics of any aquatic system
since all the biochemical activities depend on pH of the surrounding water. The
lake water was slightly alkaline having pH ranging from 8.2 to 8.4. According
to Previous studies, pH value does not increase more than 8.5 (Ahmed et al., 1985; Leghari
et al., 2004). PH values
recorded were favorable for zooplankton production as they are not anywhere
close to death points for zooplankton.
In
present study the value of salinity was found to be 0.1ppt. During this study
period, it was observed there was no fluctuation in salinity value at any
station. Change in salinity can affect biota in fresh water directly or
indirectly. Toxic effects as a consequence of increasing salinity cause
physiological changes resulting in loss or gain of species. Indirect change can
occur where increasing salinity modifies community structure and function by
removing or adding texa that provide refuge, food or
modify predation pressure. Other factors such as water- logging or loss of
habitat may interact with salinity or have more abrupt impact on species
richness (Savage, 1979; Clunie et al., 2002).
Electric
conductivity ranged from 294.5 us to349.5us
during the present study.
Water quality indicated that this lake is in early stage of eutrophication
(Ahmed et al., 1985).
According to Vajrappa and Singh (2005), water having
conductivity below 750μmhos/cm is satisfactory. In this study,
conductivity level can be said to be within the limit hence, favorable for the
growth of phytoplankton upon which zooplankton feed. The total dissolved solids
(TDS) were recorded as 0.1661gm/l -0.2232 gm/l. The values of TDS were maximum in the month of April (Sabata
and Nayar, 1995). The value of turbidity ranges
between 4.71NTU to 13.22 NTU. The increased turbidity during rainy months was
attributed to soil erosion in the nearby catchment and massive contribution of
suspended solids from sewage. Surface runoffs and domestic wastes mainly
contribute to the increased turbidity of the reservoir. But in this region the
suspended solids play an important role in governing the turbidity, which enter
the reservoir through land erosion.
Dissolved oxygen
(DO) is a very important parameter of water quality and index of physical and
biological process going on in water. In the present study, the dissolved
oxygen concentration ranged from 7.8 mg/l to 8.6 mg/l) was recorded in the
month of May after the snow melting due to rainfall, which favours
solubility of oxygen among the study sites. DO is of great importance to all
living organisms. It may be present in water due to direct diffusion from air
and photosynthetic activity of autotrophs.
Concentration of DO is one of the most important parameters to indicate water
purity and to determine the distribution and abundance of various planktons.
Alkalinity of
water is a measure of weak acid present in it and of the cations
balanced against them. Alkalinity plays an important role in controlling enzyme
activities. In the present study alkalinity value was between 120.6 mg/l to
128.2 mg/l. Different values of alkalinity on different sites of the present
study showed variations in different months. Venkateswarlu
(1969) recognized that there is an indication to suggest that alkalinity
concentration is affected directly by rainfall. Similar effect has been noticed
in the present investigation immediately often the onset of rains. Man-made water bodies usually show wide range
of fluctuation in alkalinity values depending upon a number of factors.
According to Michael (1969), alkalinity concentration is affected directly by
rainfall. In the present investigation also, alkalinity level reduced in the
post-rainy months. Higher level of alkalinity during summer months as observed
in most of the sites has also been reported by Singh and Saha
(1987).
Chloride is one
of the important indicators of pollution. Chlorides are present in sewage,
effluents and farm drainage. The observed values of chloride during the present
study ranged from 78.3mg/l to 88.3 mg/l. The average value of chloride recorded
82.1 mg/l. The seasonal trend in the chloride was found to be same during
present investigation. CO2 values in Chashma
Lake water ranged from 12.3 mg/l to 13.0 mg/l and remained quite normal during
entire period of study. The limit of CO2 as per acceptable standards
value 10 mg /l of surface water and increase in CO2 above this level
indicates increase in pollution load (Koshy and Nair,
1999). Dwivedi and Sonar (2004) observed an average
of 2 mg/l of free CO2 in water of a reservoir. Radhika
et al., (2004) reported
an annual variation of 2.42 to 10.47 mg /l of CO2 in Vellayani Lake in Kerala. The same author
found that there was a gradual change in concentration ofCO2 in the
Lake from pre-monsoon to monsoon to post monsoon. In this study, it was found
that the physico-chemical parameters of the
reservoirs tested were not harmful for the survival of zooplanktons,
rather they were significant in the improvement of productivity. Measurements
of the concentrations of the parameters are within permissible limits. A total of 18 zooplankton species were
identified during present study. These included 7 species of rotifera, 6 species of cladocera
and 5 species of copepod (Table 2). Among rotifers Keratella valga tropica was most common. The other rotifer species Asplanchna herricki, Brachionus angularis, Keratella cochlearis, Keratella tecta, Asplanchna brightwelli and Polyarthra remata were rare in zooplankton community.
Apart from rotifera, six species of cladocera
were also seen in the lake, these were Bosmina longirostris,
Daphnia pulex, Chydorus sphaericus, Alona
bicolor, Alonella exigua and
Simocephalus serrulatus.
From quantitative analysis it was observed that both species Bosmina longirostris
and Daphnia pulex
were dominant in the lake and nearly in equal density. While others species of cladocera were common in the lake. The dominance of D. pulex and the low relative abundance of other Daphnia
species suggest the absence of effective fish predation, even though all
ponds contained fish. Low fish predation leads to the dominance of large cladocerans either through competitive superiority of large
species (Hall et al.,
1976; Gliwicz, 1990).
Five species of
copepod were also present in the Lake, these included Diacyclops thomasi that contributed with higher
population. Acanthocyclops robustus, Tropocyclops prasinus mexicanus, Mesocyclops edax and Orthocyclops modestus were also present with low populations.
Relative lower copepod population suggests that it is not a food-poor
environment and hence Cladocera are more successful.
The rotifers are adaptable in nature and appear and disappear within a very
short period of time. The community structure of zooplankton showed a mixed
composition of mesotrophic to eutrophic
species. Mostly the Brachionous species are also found in eutrophic environments (Hakkari,
1978; Gannon and Stemberger, 1978; Maemets, 1983; Baloch et al., 2004). On the other hand, species
like K. valga tropica is found in mesotrophic
environments and is abundant in riverine systems
(Beach, 1960; Baloch et al., 2000; Baloch and Soomro, 2004). Abundance of mesotrophic
species, K. valga
tropica revealed that the lake is not yet
completely eutrophic. However, presence of eutrophic indicator species, K. cochlearis and K. tecta indicated that the trend is
going from mesotrophic to eutrophic.
Among Cladocerans, B. lorzgirostris
and Daphnia pulex
are lacustrine species, former occurs usually in mesotrophic to eutrophic
environments (Swar and Fernando, 1980).
During the
present study, it was observed that mainly water temperature regulates the
density and diversity of dominant zooplankton population in the freshwater.
During this study period, it was observed that water temperature ranged from
22.9 to 29.9°C which was suitable for all studied zooplankton. Evidence
suggests zooplanktons are more sensitive to changes in temperature than
phytoplankton in other environments. For example, moderate warming enhances the
growth and feeding rates of many filter-feeding zooplankton species, such as
some Daphnia sp. (McKee and Ebert
1996). Warmer temperature can favor smaller zooplankton at developmental
stages. In addition, large cladocerans and copepods
may show reduced fecundity at elevated temperatures. Zooplankton abundance
declined because lethal increases in water temperatures above 45°C resulted in
crustacean species being replaced by smaller rotifers (Strecker
et al., 2004; Taylor and
Mahoney, 1988). From the zooplankton community structure of Chashma
Lake it can be concluded that it is a slightly mesotrophic
lake rapidly changing to eutrophic stage. Further
studies of zooplankton on seasonal basis are required for better understanding
of the lake environment. Conductivity, salinity and water
temperature showed significant correlation ship with zooplankton abundance (AbdAllah et al.,
2017).
Table
1.
Values
of different Physico-chemical parameters of Chashma lake during spring season
(March 2016 to May 2016)
Sr. No |
Parameter |
Unit |
Value Range |
1 |
Water Temperature |
(oC) |
22.9-29.9 |
2 |
PH |
|
8.1-8.4 |
3 |
Salinity |
(ppt) |
0.1-0.1 |
4 |
Conductivity |
(us) |
294.5-349.5 |
5 |
T.D. S |
(gm/L) |
0.1661-0.2232 |
6 |
Turbidity |
(NTU) |
4.71-13.22 |
7 |
Dissolved Oxygen |
(mg/L) |
8.5-8.6 |
8 |
Alkalinity |
(mg/L) |
120.6-128.2 |
9 |
Chloride |
(mg/L) |
78.3-88.3 |
10 |
Carbon Dioxide |
(mg/L) |
10.4-13.0 |
Table
2.
Zooplankton species and their occurrence in Chashma lake in spring season (March 2016 to May 2016)
Sr. No |
Zooplankton |
Occurrence |
||||
Rotifera |
||||||
1 |
Asplanchna
herrick |
+ |
||||
2 |
Brachionus
angularis |
+ |
||||
3 |
Keratella
cochlearis |
++ |
||||
4 |
Keratella
tecta |
+ |
||||
5 |
Keratella
valga tropica |
+++ |
||||
6 |
Asplanchna brightwelli |
++ |
||||
7 |
Polyarthra remata |
+ |
||||
Cladocera |
||||||
8 |
Bosmina
longirostris |
++++ |
||||
9 |
Daphnia pulex |
++++ |
||||
10 |
Chydorus sphaericus |
+++ |
||||
11 |
Alona bicolor |
++ |
||||
12 |
Alonella
exigua |
++ |
||||
13 |
Simocephalus
serrulatus |
+++ |
||||
Copepoda |
||||||
14 |
Diacyclops
thomasi |
++++ |
||||
15 |
Acanthocyclops robustus |
++ |
||||
16 |
Tropocyclops prasinus mexicanus |
++ |
||||
17 |
Mesocyclops edax |
++ |
||||
18 |
Orthocyclops modestus |
++ |
||||
++++
Abundant +++ fairly present ++ common + rare
Conflict
of interest
The authors declared the absence of any
conflict of interest.
References
AbdAllah, T.A., Adel, A., Mohammad, J.K.S., Sahar,
H.H., Mohammed, S., and Abdel, D. (2017).
Seasonal Abundance of Zooplankton at Mangrove and Sandy Shore Habitat at Almarjan Zone, Jazan. Atmospheric
and Oceanic Sciences, 2(4): 102-108.
Ahmed,
M.M., Barlas, A. and Iqbal,
Q.J. (1985).
Some Physico-chemical variables of Rawal, lake Islamabad. Pak. J. Zool., 17(3): 313-316.
Akhter,
S. and Ali, S.R. (1976). The rotifers
of Pakistan I. Bull. Hydrobiol. Res. Gordon
College Ser. 1(1):
12-122.
Baloch,
W.A. and Soomro, A.N. (2004). Rotifers of the adjacent areas of Hyderabad, Sindh.
Pak. J. Zool. 36(4): 319-322.
Baloch,
W.A., Soomro, A.N. and Jafri,
S.I.H. (2004).
Zooplankton of highly saline water, near Hyderabad. Sind.
Univ. Res. Jour. (Sci. Ser.)., 36(1): 25-28.
Baloch, W.A., Suzuki,
H. and Onoue, Y.
(2000). Occurrence of planktonic
rotifer Filinia longiseta
in Southern Kyushu, Japan. Pak. J.
Zool., 32(3): 279-281.
Baqai,
I.U., Siddiqui, P.A. and Iqbal,
M. (1974).
Limnological studies of Haleji
lake. Agri. Pakistan. 2:
321-344.
Battish,
S.K. (1992).
Freshwater Zooplankton of India. Oxford
and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd.
Branco, C.W.C., Mariea-Isabel, A. R., Pinto, G.F.S., Gomaro, G.A. and de Filippo., R.,
(2002). Limnological features of Funil reservoirs (R.J. Brazil) and indicator properties of
rotifers and cladocerans of the zooplankton community
of lakes and reservoirs. Res.
and Manag. 7: 187-192.
Castro, P. and Huber, M. (2012). Marine Biology. Ninth Edition. McGraw Hill publishers. FAO, 2006. Mangrove, description, Saudi Arabia. www.FAO.org
Clunie,
P., Ryan, T., James, K. and Cant, B. (2002). Implications
for rivers from salinity hazards: Scoping Stusy.
Report produced for the Murray Darling Basin commission, Strategic Investigations
and Riverine Program Project R2003. Department of Natural resources and Environment, Vic.
Delhi,
N., and Beach, N.W. (1960). A study of the planktonic rotifers of the Presque Isle County, Michigan.
Ecol. Monogr. 30: 339-357.
Dwivedi, P., and Sonar,
S. (2004). Evaluation of Physico-chemical and
biological characteristics of water samples in water reservoir around Rono Hills, Doimmukh (Dist. Pampum Pare), Arunachal preadesh,
Pollution Research. 23(1): 101-104.
Fontaine,
C.T. and Revera, D.B. (1986). The mass culture of rotifers, Branchionu
splicatalis, for use as food stuff in aquaculture. Proc. World Mariculture Soc. 11: 211-218.
Gannon,
J.E., and Stemberger, R.S. (1978). Zooplankton,
(Especially crustaceans and rotifers) as indicator of water quality. Trans Anz Illicros Soc. 97: 16-35.
Geiger, J.G., (1983).
A review of ponds zooplankton productions fertilization for
the culture of larval and fingerlings. Aquaculture. 36: 353-360.
Gliwicz, M.Z., (1990).
Food thresholds and body size in Cladocera. Nature. 343: 638–640.
Hakkari, L., (1978). On the productivity and ecology of zooplankton and its roleas food for fish in some lakes in central Finland.
Biol. Res. Rep. Univ. Gyvaskyla.
4: 3-87.
Hall, D.J., Threlkeld, S.T., Burns, C.W. and Crowley, P.H., (1976). The
size-efficiency hypothesis and the size structure of zooplankton communities. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 7: 177–208.
Iqbal,
M., and Kazmi, M.A. (1990). Cladocera of Hub lake with notes
on species and size composition. Sarlzad J. Agri. 6: 85-88.
Jeje,
C.Y. and Fernando, C.H. (1986). A practical guide to the identification
of Nigerian zooplankton. Kainji Lake Research
Institute, Niger, Nigeria.
Jeje, C.Y., (1988).
A revision of the Nigerian species of the genera MesocyclopsSars,
1914 and Thermocyclops Kiefer, 1927 (Copepoda: Cycloida). Hydrobiologia. 164: 171-184.
Korovchinsky, N., (1992). Introduction to the Cladocerans manual
for the 1992-1993 International Training Course at University of Gent, Gent.
Netherland.
Koshy,
M., and Nair, T.V. (1999). Water quality aspects
of River Pampa, Pollution Research.
18(4): 501-510.
Koste,
W., (19780.
Rotatoria.
Die Radetiere Mitteleuropas.
Bestimmungs werkbegrundet von Max Voigt. Borntraeger,
Stuttgart, Germany.
Lawson, E.O., (2011). Physico-Chemical
Parameters and Heavy Metal Contents of Water from the Mangrove Swamps of Lagos
Lagoon, Lagos, Nigeria, Adv. Biol. Res.
5: 08-21.
Leghari,
M.K., Leghari, M.Y., and Leghari,
S.M. (2004).
Water chemistry and its relationship with algae of Rawal
Dam, Islamabad and Wah garden, District Attock. Sind. Univ. Res. Jour.
(Sci. Ser.). 36(2):
29-48.
Maemets, A., (1983).
Rotifers as indicators of Lake types in Estonia. Hydrobiologia 104: 357-361.
Mahar,
M.A., Baloch, W.A. and Jafri,
S.I.H. (2000).
Diversity and seasonal occurrence of planktonic
rotifers in Manchar lake, Sindh, Pakistan. Pakistan. J. fish. 1(1): 25-32.
McKee,
D., and Ebert, D. (1996). The interactive effects of temperature,
food level and material phenotype on offspring size in Daphnia magna. Oecologia. 107:
189 -196.
Meadows,
A. and Meadows, P.S. (1999). The Indus River Biodiversity resources
humankind. 1st ed. Oxford University Press, 5- Banglore Town, Sharae Faisal,
Karachi.
Michael, R.G., (1969). Seasonal trends in physico-chemical
factors and plankton of freshwater fish pond and their role in fish culture. Hydrobiologia. 33. 145-60.
Mizuno,
T., and Takahashi, E. (1991). An illustrated guide to Freshwater
Zooplankton in Japan. Tokai University Press.
Mizuno,
T., (1964).
Illustrations of freshwater plankton of Japan. Hoikusha.
Radhika,
C.G., Mini, I. and Gangadevi, T. (2004). Studies on Abiotic parameters of atropical
fresh water lake Vellayani
Lake, Trivandrum, Kerala. Pollution
Research. 23(1): 49-63.
Sabata, B.C., and Nayar, M.P., (1995). River pollution in India: a case study
of Ganga River. APH
Pub. Corp. 33.
Savage,
A.A., (1979). The Carixidae of an
inland saline lake from 1970 to1975. Aichiv fur Hydrobiologie. 86: 355-370.
Segers, H., 1993. Rotifera of some
lakes in the floodplain of the River Niger (Imo State, Nigeria). I. New
species and other taxonomic considerations. Hydrobiologia. 250: 39-61.
Segers,
H., Nwandiaro, S.C. and Dumont, H.J. (1993). Rotifera
of some lakes in the floodplain of the River Niger (Imo State, Nigeria).
Hydrobiologia. 250: 63-71.
Singh,
B. and Saha, P.K. (1987). Primary
productivity in a composite fish culture pond at Kulia
fish farm, Kalyani, West Bengal. Prod Nat Acad Sci
India. 57: 124-30.
Strecker, A.L., Cobb, T.P.,
and Vinebrooke, R.D. (2004). Effects of
experimental greenhouse warming on phytoplankton and zooplankton communities in
fishless alpine ponds, Limnol Oceanogr.
49 (4): 1182-1190.
Swar,
B.D., and Famando, C.H. (1980). Some studies on
the ecology of limnetic crustaceaus
zoolplankton in lakes Begeras
and Recepa, Pakhara Valley,
Nepal. Hyderobiolog. 70: 235-245.
Taylor,
B.E. and Mahoney, D.L. (1988). Extinction and recolonization:
Processes regulating zooplankton dynamics in a cooling reservoir. verh. Inter Limnol. 23: 1536-1541.
Templeton, R.G. (1984).
Freshwater fisheries management. Fishing News Book
Limited Farnham Surrey. England.
Ueda,
H., and Reid, W.J. (2003). Copepoda: Cyclopoida, Genera Mesocyclops
and Thermocyclops Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, Netherlands.
Unanam, A.E., and Akpan,
A.W. (2006). Analysis of physicochemical
characteristics of some freshwater bodies in Essien Udim Local Government area of AkwaIbom
State, Nigeria, In: Proceeding of the 21st Annual Conference of the Fisheries
Society of Nigeria (FI50N) Calabar, 13th -17th
November.
Vajrappa,
H.C., and Singh, N.R. (2005). Hydrochemical
studies of Suvarna mukhisub-basin
of Arkavathi river,
Bangalore district, Karnataka. In: Fundamentals of Limnology.S.B.
Nangia for
APH Publishing Corporation 5, Ansari road, Darya Ganj, New Delhi, 171-181.
Venkateswarlu,
V., (1969).
An ecological study of the algae of the river Moosi,
Hyderabad (India) with special reference to water pollution-I: Physico-chemical complexes. Hydrobiologia, 33,117-43.
Ward,
H.B., and Whipple, G.C. (1959). Fresh water
Biology. John Wiley and Sons.
Welch, P.S. (1952). Limnology Second Edition. McGraw Hill,
Book Co. New York and London.
Williamson,
C.E. (1991). Ecology and classification of North American
freshwater invertebrates. In. J.H, 125-188. Thorp & A.P. Cov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.