Biochemical TSH Response and Short-Term Tolerability of Recombinant Human TSH versus Levothyroxine Withdrawal in Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma

Authors

  • Muhammad Farhan Medical Laboratory Technologist, Shah Noor Medical Laboratory, Railway Road, Bannu, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Shah Noor Shah Medical Laboratory Technologist, Shah Noor Medical Laboratory, Railway Road, Bannu, Pakistan
  • Zohaib Khan Medical Laboratory Technologist, Shah Noor Medical Laboratory, Railway Road, Bannu, Pakistan
  • Haidar Ali Microbiology and Immunology from National University of Medical Sciences Rawalpindi, Pakistan, image/svg+xml
  • Tahir Ullah MLS, Riphah International University Islamabad and Lecturer of MLT, RMI, Peshawar, image/svg+xml
  • Naqash Wali Khan Medical Laboratory Technologist, Shah Noor Medical Laboratory, Railway Road, Bannu, Pakistan
  • Mohammad Haris MLT, Shaheed zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University Islamabad, Pakistan, image/svg+xml
  • Shujaat Ahmad Khattak MLT, Rehman Medical Institute, Peshawar, Pakistan, image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v7i6.2367

Keywords:

Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma; Recombinant Human TSH; Thyrotropin Alfa; Levothyroxine Withdrawal; Serum TSH; Tolerability

Abstract

Recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone (rhTSH) and levothyroxine withdrawal are commonly used to increase serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) before radioactive iodine procedures in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma. These approaches differ in their duration, biochemical response and associated symptoms. Objective: To compare the serum TSH response and short-term tolerability of rhTSH administration and levothyroxine withdrawal in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Methods: This prospective nonrandomized comparative study included 50 patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma treated at the Bannu Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Oncology and Radiotherapy, Pakistan, from February to July 2019. Twenty-seven patients received two intramuscular injections of 0.9 mg rhTSH administered 24 hours apart while continuing levothyroxine, whereas 23 patients underwent levothyroxine withdrawal for four to eight weeks. Serum TSH was measured at baseline and after stimulation. A serum TSH concentration of at least 30 mIU/L was considered an adequate biochemical response. Final TSH concentrations were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test, and the proportions of patients reporting symptoms were compared using Fisher’s exact test. Results: In the rhTSH group, mean serum TSH increased from 0.16 ± 0.19 mIU/L at baseline to 45.46 ± 9.65 mIU/L after the first dose and 84.88 ± 9.42 mIU/L after the second dose. Following levothyroxine withdrawal, mean serum TSH increased from 0.91 ± 1.71 to 51.20 ± 8.88 mIU/L. All patients in both groups achieved serum TSH concentrations of at least 30 mIU/L. Final stimulated TSH concentrations were significantly higher in the rhTSH group than in the withdrawal group (median, 86.30 versus 47.90 mIU/L; Mann–Whitney U test, p < 0.001). At least one treatment-related symptom was reported by 4 of 27 patients receiving rhTSH and 17 of 23 patients undergoing levothyroxine withdrawal (14.8% versus 73.9%; Fisher’s exact test, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Both preparation methods produced adequate biochemical TSH stimulation in all patients. Recombinant human TSH achieved stimulation more rapidly and was associated with fewer reported short-term symptoms than levothyroxine withdrawal. However, because allocation was nonrandomized and radioiodine treatment outcomes were not evaluated, the findings should not be interpreted as evidence of superior oncological effectiveness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
0

References

1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. *CA Cancer J Clin.* 2021;71(3):209–249.

2. Kitahara CM, Schneider AB. Epidemiology of thyroid cancer. *Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev.* 2022;31(7):1284–1297.

3. Chen DW, Lang BHH, McLeod DSA, Newbold K, Haymart MR. Thyroid cancer. *Lancet.* 2023;401(10387):1531–1544.

4. Matrone A, Campopiano MC, Nervo A, Sapuppo G, Tavarelli M, De Leo S. Differentiated thyroid cancer, from active surveillance to advanced therapy: toward a personalized medicine. *Front Endocrinol (Lausanne).* 2020;10:884.

5. Tuttle RM, Ahuja S, Avram AM, Bernet VJ, Bourguet P, Daniels GH, et al. Controversies, consensus, and collaboration in the use of I-131 therapy in differentiated thyroid cancer: a joint statement from the American Thyroid Association, the European Association of Nuclear Medicine, the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, and the European Thyroid Association. *Thyroid.* 2019;29(4):461–470.

6. Pacini F, Führer D, Elisei R, Handkiewicz-Junak D, Leboulleux S, Luster M, et al. 2022 ETA consensus statement: what are the indications for post-surgical radioiodine therapy in differentiated thyroid cancer? *Eur Thyroid J.* 2022;11(1).

7. Dehbi HM, Mallick U, Wadsley J, Newbold K, Harmer C, Hackshaw A. Recurrence after low-dose radioiodine ablation and recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone for differentiated thyroid cancer (HiLo): long-term results of an open-label, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial. *Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol.* 2019;7(1):44–51.

8. Schlumberger M, Leboulleux S, Catargi B, Deandreis D, Zerdoud S, Bardet S, et al. Outcome after ablation in patients with low-risk thyroid cancer (ESTIMABL1): 5-year follow-up results of a randomised, phase 3, equivalence trial. *Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol.* 2018;6(8):618–626.

9. Tang CYL, Thang SP, Zaheer S, Kwan CK, Ng DCE. Recombinant human thyrotropin versus thyroid hormone withdrawal in an Asian population. *Endocrine.* 2020;69(1):126–132.

10. Aziz A, Masood MQ, Sattar S, Fatima S, Islam N. Follicular thyroid carcinoma in a developing country: a 10-year retrospective study. *Cureus.* 2021;13(7).

11. Gu Y, Xu H, Yang Y, Xiu Y, Hu P, Liu M, et al. Evaluation of SNA001, a novel recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone injection, in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma. *Front Endocrinol (Lausanne).* 2021;11:615883.

12. Lin YS, Yang H, Li XY, Wu LQ, Xu JG, Yang AM, et al. Novel recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone in aiding postoperative assessment of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer: phase I/II study. *Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging.* 2022;49(12):4171–4181.

13. Sahin M, Aydogan BI, Ozkan E, Emral R, Gullu S, Erdogan MF, et al. Recombinant human thyrotropin versus thyroid hormone withdrawal in differentiated thyroid carcinoma follow-up: a single-center experience. *Acta Endocrinol (Buchar).* 2021;17(3):337–345.

14. Schumm MA, Pyo HQ, Kim J, Tseng CH, Yeh MW, Leung AM, et al. Recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone versus thyroid hormone withdrawal preparation for radioiodine ablation in differentiated thyroid cancer in children, adolescents, and young adults. *Clin Endocrinol (Oxf).* 2021;95(2):344–353.

15. Tan H, Gu Y, Xiu Y, Han X, Wen Q, Lv Z, et al. Recombinant human thyrotropin plus radioactive iodine among patients with thyroid cancer: a noninferiority randomized clinical trial. *JAMA Netw Open.* 2024;7(11).

16. Park S, Bang JI, Kim K, Seo Y, Chong A, Hong CM, et al. Comparison of recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone and thyroid hormone withdrawal for 131I therapy in patients with intermediate- to high-risk thyroid cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. *Clin Nucl Med.* 2024;49(3):e104.

17. Giovanella L, Garo ML, Campennì A, Petranović Ovčariček P, Görges R. Thyroid hormone withdrawal versus recombinant human TSH as preparation for I-131 therapy in patients with metastatic thyroid cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. *Cancers (Basel).* 2023;15(9):2510.

18. Gomes-Lima CJ, Chittimoju S, Wehbeh L, Dia S, Pagadala P, Al-Jundi M, et al. Metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer survival is unaffected by mode of preparation for 131I administration. *J Endocr Soc.* 2022;6(5).

19. Simões-Pereira J, Ferreira TC, Limbert E, Cavaco BM, Leite V. Outcomes of thyrotropin alfa versus levothyroxine withdrawal-aided radioiodine therapy for distant metastasis of papillary thyroid cancer. *Thyroid.* 2021;31(10):1514–1522.

20. Campennì A, Ruggeri RM, Siracusa M, Comis AD, Romano D, Vento A, et al. Early preablation rhTSH-stimulated thyroglobulin predicts outcome of differentiated thyroid cancer patients. *Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging.* 2021;48(8):2466–2475.

21. Signore A, Campagna G, Marinaccio J, de Vitis M, Lauri C, Berardinelli F, et al. Analysis of short-term and stable DNA damage in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer treated with 131I in hypothyroidism or with recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone for remnant ablation. *J Nucl Med.* 2022;63(10):1515–1522.

22. Furqan S, Ahmed A, Batool S, Islam N. Outcome analysis of differentiated thyroid cancer: experience from tertiary care in Karachi. *Pak J Med Sci.* 2024;40(11):2631–2635.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

1.
Farhan M, Noor Shah MS, Khan Z, Ali H, Ullah T, Khan NW, et al. Biochemical TSH Response and Short-Term Tolerability of Recombinant Human TSH versus Levothyroxine Withdrawal in Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma. Biol Clin Sci Res J [Internet]. 2026 Jun. 30 [cited 2026 Aug. 11];7(6):41-7. Available from: https://bcsrj.com/ojs/index.php/bcsrj/article/view/2367

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles

Categories

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.