Effects of Salinity Stress on Crop Yield and Management Strategies in Pakistan

Authors

  • Mehwish Rani Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan
  • Huma Aslam Department of Botany, The Women University, Multan, Punjab, Pakistan
  • Banista Batool Department of Botany, The Women University, Multan, Punjab, Pakistan
  • Tahira Bibi Department of Botany, Sardar Bahadur Khan Women's University, Quetta, Baluchistan, Pakistan
  • Sher Hassan Directorate of Agriculture Research, Zhob, Baluchistan, Pakistan
  • Javaid Hassan Department of Soil and Environmental Science, University of Agriculture, Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan
  • Rehan Khalid Department of Horticulture, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan
  • Shabana Hassan Fodder Research Institute, Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan
  • Zubair Ahmed Khan Department of Horticulture, University of Agriculture, Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan
  • Saif Ur Rehman Department of Horticulture, University of Agriculture, Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v7i4.2280

Keywords:

Agriculture, Crops, Pakistan, Salinity, Soil

Abstract

Soil salinity is a major abiotic constraint to agricultural productivity in Pakistan, particularly in irrigated and arid agricultural regions where salt accumulation affects soil quality, crop growth, and grain yield. Objective: To evaluate the effect of soil salinity stress on crop yield and assess the yield pattern associated with selected salinity management strategies under Pakistani field conditions. Methods: This field-based analytical study was conducted from July 2025 to January 2026 in salinity-prone agricultural areas of Pakistan. A total of 10 field observations involving major crops, including wheat, rice, cotton, and maize, were included. Soil salinity was measured as electrical conductivity of saturated soil extract (ECe) and categorized as low, moderate, high, or severe. Soil pH, irrigation-water electrical conductivity, plant height, grain yield, percentage yield reduction, and applied salinity management strategy were recorded. Continuous variables were summarized as mean ± standard deviation. Grain yield was compared across salinity categories using one-way ANOVA. Pearson correlation and simple linear regression were used to assess the association between soil salinity and grain yield. Results: The mean soil salinity was 6.81 ± 3.50 dS/m, while mean grain yield was 3.57 ± 1.40 t/ha. Grain yield declined progressively with increasing salinity, from 5.06 ± 0.57 t/ha under low salinity to 1.73 ± 0.30 t/ha under severe salinity. Mean yield reduction increased from 4.00% in low-salinity fields to 62.50% in severe-salinity fields. The difference in grain yield across salinity categories was statistically significant, F(3,6) = 31.35, p < 0.001. Soil salinity showed a strong inverse correlation with grain yield (r = −0.942, p < 0.001). Regression analysis showed that soil salinity explained 88.8% of yield variation, with each 1 dS/m increase in ECe associated with a 0.357 t/ha decrease in grain yield. Improved irrigation showed the highest descriptive mean yield among management strategies; however, subgroup comparisons were limited by small and unequal sample sizes. Conclusion: Increasing soil salinity was strongly associated with reduced crop yield under Pakistani field conditions. Soil salinity, irrigation-water quality, and soil alkalinity were key factors influencing yield performance, while better vegetative growth was associated with higher productivity. Integrated salinity management, including improved irrigation, organic amendments, gypsum application where appropriate, salt-tolerant cultivars, and routine soil and water monitoring, may help sustain crop productivity in salt-affected areas. Larger multi-location studies are required to validate these findings and compare management strategies more robustly.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
1601

References

1. Hassani A, Azapagic A, Shokri N. Global predictions of primary soil salinization under changing climate in the 21st century. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):6663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26907-3

2. Singh A. Soil salinization management for sustainable development: a review. J Environ Manage. 2021;277:111383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111383

3. Mukhopadhyay R, Sarkar B, Jat HS, Sharma PC, Bolan NS. Soil salinity under climate change: challenges for sustainable agriculture and food security. J Environ Manage. 2021;280:111736. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111736

4. Hopmans JW, Qureshi AS, Kisekka I, Munns R, Grattan SR, Rengasamy P, et al. Critical knowledge gaps and research priorities in global soil salinity. Adv Agron. 2021;169:1-191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2021.03.001

5. Atta K, Mondal S, Gorai S, Singh AP, Kumari A, Ghosh T, et al. Impacts of salinity stress on crop plants: improving salt tolerance through genetic and molecular dissection. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1241736. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1241736

6. Qureshi AS, Perry C. Managing water and salt for sustainable agriculture in the Indus Basin of Pakistan. Sustainability. 2021;13(9):5303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095303

7. Qureshi AS. Groundwater governance in Pakistan: from colossal development to neglected management. Water. 2020;12(11):3017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w12113017

8. Kanwal R, Maqsood MF, Shahbaz M, Naz N, Zulfiqar U, Ali MF, et al. Exogenous ascorbic acid as a potent regulator of antioxidants, osmo-protectants, and lipid peroxidation in pea under salt stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2024;24(1):247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-04947-3

9. Maab Z, Smolenaars WJ, Jamil MK, Biemans H. Assessing the risk of soil salinization in an intensively irrigated area of Pakistan. Discov Water. 2025;5:64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43832-025-00268-0

10. Thorslund J, Bierkens MFP, Oude Essink GHP, Sutanudjaja EH, van Vliet MTH. Common irrigation drivers of freshwater salinisation in river basins worldwide. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):4232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24281-8

11. Zheng C, Liu C, Liu L, Tan Y, Sheng X, Yu D, et al. Effect of salinity stress on rice yield and grain quality: a meta-analysis. Eur J Agron. 2023;144:126765. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2023.126765

12. Nicolas F, Kamai T, Ben-Gal A, Ochoa-Brito J, Daccache A, Ogunmokun F, et al. Assessing salinity impacts on crop yield and economic returns in the Central Valley. Agric Water Manag. 2023;287:108463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108463

13. Bhuyan MI, Supit I, Mia S, Mulder M, Ludwig F. Effect of soil and water salinity on dry season boro rice production in the south-central coastal area of Bangladesh. Heliyon. 2023;9(8):e19180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19180

14. Bello SK, Alayafi AH, Al-Solaimani SG, Abo-Elyousr KAM. Mitigating soil salinity stress with gypsum and bio-organic amendments: a review. Agronomy. 2021;11(9):1735. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11091735

15. Chaudhary MT, Majeed S, Rana IA, Ali Z, Jia Y, Du X, et al. Impact of salinity stress on cotton and opportunities for improvement through conventional and biotechnological approaches. BMC Plant Biol. 2024;24(1):20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04558-4

16. Hoque MN, Imran S, Hannan A, Paul NC, Mahamud MA, Chakrobortty J, et al. Organic amendments for mitigation of salinity stress in plants: a review. Life (Basel). 2022;12(10):1632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/life12101632

17. Kumar A, Singh S, Gaurav AK, Srivastava S, Verma JP. Plant growth-promoting bacteria: biological tools for the mitigation of salinity stress in plants. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01216

18. Amer MM, Elbagory M, El-Nahrawy S, Omara AE-D. Impact of gypsum and bio-priming of maize grains on soil properties, physiological attributes and yield under saline-sodic soil conditions. Agronomy. 2022;12(10):2550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102550

19. Awan ZA, Ramzani PMA, Khan LA, Imran A, Khilji SA, Gaafar ARZ. Mitigating salinity stress and improving cotton productivity through integrative use of gypsum and compost amendments with exogenous proline. J King Saud Univ Sci. 2024;36(8):103327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2024.103327

20. Mishra P, Mishra J, Arora NK. Plant growth promoting bacteria for combating salinity stress in plants: recent developments and prospects. Microbiol Res. 2021;252:126861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2021.126861

21. Smolenaars WJ, Sommerauer WJW, van der Bolt B, Jamil MK, Dhaubanjar S, Lutz A, et al. Spatial adaptation pathways to reconcile future water and food security in the Indus River basin. Commun Earth Environ. 2023;4:410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-01070-3

22. Smolenaars WJ, Jamil MK, Dhaubanjar S, Lutz AF, Immerzeel W, Ludwig F, et al. Exploring the potential of agricultural system change as an integrated adaptation strategy for water and food security in the Indus basin. Environ Dev Sustain. 2024;26(6):15177-15192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03245-6

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

1.
Rani M, Aslam H, Batool B, Bibi T, Hassan S, Hassan J, et al. Effects of Salinity Stress on Crop Yield and Management Strategies in Pakistan. Biol Clin Sci Res J [Internet]. 2026 Apr. 30 [cited 2026 Aug. 12];7(4):27-31. Available from: https://bcsrj.com/ojs/index.php/bcsrj/article/view/2280

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles

Categories

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.